Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Find the value for the constant $k$ such that

$$\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} \frac{(4^{kx}+6)}{(4^{2x}+4)}$$

exists.

share|improve this question
1  
Can you guess?? –  Ross Millikan Jan 15 '13 at 21:25
1  
Hint: What happens when $k > 2$? –  mrf Jan 15 '13 at 21:25
1  
Hi! Welcome to math.SE! This forum is full of free-spirited people who are happy to respond to questions. You have techincally written a question, but lots of potential answerers are going to go help another poster who frames his/her question nicely by including partial work and thoughts, and who phrased their question less like a command. You might consider making such changes to improve your chances of getting a good answer. –  rschwieb Jan 15 '13 at 21:28

2 Answers 2

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Hint:
Divide all terms in numerator and denominator by $4^{2x}:$ $$L= \lim_{x\rightarrow +\infty} \frac{4^{kx}+6}{4^{2x}+4}= \lim_{x\rightarrow+\infty} \frac{4^{(k-2)x}+\dfrac{6}{4^{2x}}}{1+\dfrac{4}{4^{2x}}}$$ Since $\dfrac{6}{4^{2x}}\underset{x\to{+\infty}}{\to 0}$ and $\dfrac{4}{4^{2x}}\underset{x\to{+\infty}}{\to 0}$ then depending on value of $k$ we have following possibilities:

  1. $k>2 \Rightarrow {4^{(k-2)x} \underset{x\to{+\infty}}{\to {+\infty}}},$ therefore, $L=+\infty$;
  2. $k=2 \Rightarrow L=1 $;
  3. $k<2 \Rightarrow L=0 $.
share|improve this answer
    
so would this leave me with 1^(k-2)? Its been a while since Ive had to divide exponents which leaves me very rusty –  user57172 Jan 15 '13 at 21:32
    
oh so k would have to be equal to or less than 2 in order for the limit to exist? –  user57172 Jan 15 '13 at 21:50
    
Yes, limit exist for $k\leqslant{2}.$ –  M. Strochyk Jan 15 '13 at 21:54

Hint: when $x$ gets large, the $6$ is negligible compared with $4^{kx}$. You can make this explicit by dividing through by $4^{kx}$

share|improve this answer
    
so would that leave me with 1/1^(2-k) or did I do that wrong? –  user57172 Jan 15 '13 at 21:35
    
@user57172: you are right, you can ignore the $+4$ as well. No, it should be $\frac 1{4^{(2-k)x}}$. Now can you find what happens for various values of $k$ as $x$ gets large? –  Ross Millikan Jan 15 '13 at 21:39
    
wouldnt the limit go towards infinity for any number of k though, other than 2 itself? –  user57172 Jan 15 '13 at 21:46
    
@user57172: No, if $k=1$, for example, it will decrease to zero. –  Ross Millikan Jan 15 '13 at 21:50
    
oh ok I see that now! –  user57172 Jan 15 '13 at 21:53

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.