Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

If one "glues" together a cylinder $C$ with a cylinder $C'$ the resulting space should be a torus as a subspace of $\mathbb R^3$. Both $C$ and $C'$ are $S^1 \times [0,1]$. If I understand it correctly the identification requires two maps $f: C \to \mathbb R^3$ and $g: C' \to \mathbb R^3$ with the property that $f(x)=g(x) \in S^1 \subseteq \mathbb R^3$ on $S^1 \times \{0\}$ and $f(x)=g(x) \in S^1 \subseteq \mathbb R^3$ on $S^1 \times \{1\}$ such that $f,g$ are continuous and one-to-one.

What I'm struggling with is how to define $f$ and $g$. I tried as follows: My idea is to define $f$ and $g$ such that they are inclusion maps into the torus at the origin of $\mathbb R^3$. The torus can be parameterized as $x = \cos(s)(R+r\cos(t))$, $y=\sin(s)(R+r\cos(t))$, $z=r\sin(t)$ for $s,t \in [0,2\pi)$.

For a point $(x,y)$ on $C$ how to define $f:C \to \mathbb R^3$? I can not do it. Thank you for any help!!

share|improve this question
1  
Try visualizing it - what happens (visually) if you 'slice' your torus by a plane through the $z$-axis, say the plane $y=0$? What would this correspond to in terms of the torus's parametrization? –  Steven Stadnicki Jan 15 '13 at 16:05
1  
Also, note that after the first gluing you again obtain a cylinder, just bigger. Therefore, it's not a strictly necessary step here. It's enough to glue together two ends of a single cylinder together. –  Marek Jan 15 '13 at 16:28

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Instead of $(x,y)$, let's write $(\cos(\theta), \sin(\theta), \phi)$. Then $f$ should send this to $(\cos(\theta)(R + r\cos(\pi\phi)),\sin(\theta)(R + r\cos(\pi\phi)),r\sin(\pi\phi))$. Thus, the $\theta$ coordinate is sent to the $s$ coordinate, and the $\phi$ coordinate is sent to the first $[0,\pi]$ of the $t$ coordinate. $g$ should do likewise, but covering the $[\pi,2\pi]$ of the $t$ coordinate.

Be warned that, especially in algebraic topology, these kinds of explicit constructions tend not to be very useful. We typically only care about things like the torus as topological spaces; the specific embedding of the torus in Euclidean space is usually irrelevant.

If you continue to study topology, you'll probably see gluings like this treated more abstractly, in arguments like the following. Both cylinders are product spaces $S^1 \times [0,1]$, and the gluing ignores the $S^1$ coordinate. Thus, the glued space should be $S^1$ times the space you get by gluing two intervals along their endpoints -- that is, it's $S^1 \times S^1$, a torus.

Note that you can do this sort of gluing construction as a quotient of the disjoint union of the spaces involved. This might be easier than coming up with the target first and then trying to define the maps into it.

share|improve this answer
    
Is it possible that it is the other way around and $f$ should send $\Phi \to s = 2 \Phi$ and $\Theta \to t= \Theta $? The parametrization of $S^\times [0,1]$ you suggest is such that $\Theta \in [0, 2 \pi]$ and $\Phi \in [0 , \pi / 2]$. –  goobie Jan 16 '13 at 8:01
    
I don't think so... $\phi$ takes values in $[0,1]$, so $\pi\phi$ takes values in $[0,\pi]$. It shouldn't matter whether we send $\phi$ to $s$ and $\theta$ to $t$ or the other way around -- these are two distinct ways of gluing the two cylinders to give the torus! –  Paul VanKoughnett Jan 17 '13 at 1:50
    
I used $\phi \in [0, \pi / 2]$ as the angle in the middle of the cylinder. It also seems to work. Thank you for answering! –  goobie Jan 17 '13 at 13:55

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.