Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $G$ a Compact Lie group and $T$ a maximal torus in $G$. I'd like to write an explicit Bruhat decomposition of $G/T$ and prove in this way that the Bruhat decomposition has $|W|$ cells of even dimensions, where $W:=N(T)/T$ is the Weyl group. Now look at the case in which $G=U(n)$ (the unitary group): the quotient $U(n)/T_{n}$ is the flag variety (why? I haven't understood the reason why $GL(n,\mathbb{C})/B_{n} \simeq U(n)/T_{n} $, where $B_{n}$ is the Borel subgroup of upper-triangular non singular matrix) and the Bruhat decomposition for flag variety implies that there are $|W|$ cells of even dimensions. I tried also, under a good suggest, to prove this claim by induction on $n$. Prop. $U(n)/T_{n}$ si decompone in $|W|$ celle di dimensione pari. ( incorrect / incomplete) Proof Base of induction: $U(1)/S^{1}\simeq pt$: a 0-cell. Inductive hypothesis: we suppose that $U(n-1)/T_{n-1}= e^{0} \cup \cdots e^{2n-1}$. Now we have to prove that $U(n)/T_{n}= e^{0} \cup \cdots \cup e^{2n}$. So we can use the double quotient theorem: $(U(n)/T_{n})/(U(n-1)/T_{n-1}) \simeq S^{2n-1}/S^{1} = \mathbb{C}P^{n}$ (because $U(n)/U(n-1)= S^{2n-1}$ and $T_{n}/T_{n-1}=S^{1}$). But is a well-know fact that $\mathbb{C}P^{n}= e^{0} \cup \cdots \cup e^{2n}$. In this way the induction fails because I don't know what is the behavior of cells in the quotient. So I'm looking for a good idea in order to modify the proof in a good way.

share|cite|improve this question

the quotient U(n)/Tn is the flag variety (why? [...])

Let $ G $ be a complex semisimple Lie group, $ B $ be a Borel subgroup, $ K $ a maximal compact subgroup and $ T $ a maximal torus, then $ G/B $ is diffeomorphic to $ K/T $. (I think it is a consequence of the Iwasawa decomposition in the complex case). But now, the complete flag variety is given by the case $ G/B $ where $ G= SL(n,C)$. But recall that for this $ G $, $ K $ is given by $ U(n) $.

the Bruhat decomposition for flag variety implies that there are $|W|$ cells [...] Inductive hypothesis: we suppose that $U(n−1)/T_{n-1}=e^0 \cup ... \cup e^{2n-1}$.

At first glance the inductive hypothesis seems wrong : in this case isn't the Weyl group given by the symmetric group $ S_{n-1} $ ?

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.