Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Are there any properties of the Mandelbrot set that can be analysed without a knowledge of complicated topology?

Considering the fact that the set is based on a quadratic function, are there any interesting properties of the set that can be proved using algebra or relatively simple geometry? If there are, then what are those properties?

share|cite|improve this question
You can of course show that $M$ is bounded. Already connectedness seems to require complex analysis instead of "mere" algebra. – Hagen von Eitzen Jan 15 '13 at 14:38
Don't iterate to infinity... look at the first ten iterations, and as they get more complicated, see which terms in the long polynomials affect the shape more. Try simplifying the order 5 iteration with Fourier or wavelet techniques, then repeat. You'll likely have a billion times more computer power than the last person to look. – Ed Pegg Jan 15 '13 at 14:46
@Brian It is not hard to show that $M$ is contained in the closed idsk of radius 2. And as additional parts, you can determine the exact shape of the main cardioid and the (exactly circular!) main head. – Hagen von Eitzen Jan 15 '13 at 14:50
@Brian Is there a way to reward answers to MSE questions by accepting them? – Hagen von Eitzen Jan 15 '13 at 14:55
@Brian Rewarding answers with upvotes and accepts is a good way to encourage people to keep answering. Suggesting that you haven't done this because you've never received a useful answer is an even better way to drive everyone off. It's a shame because your questions have received some very interesting answers. – AndrewG Jan 15 '13 at 20:45

There are a number of properties about the Mandelbrot set that you can understand without knowing much math beyond basic algebra. I will list and explain a number of them, and provide refrences for further study. I will first, however, attempt to explain why such attempts will often be futile.

Part of what makes the Mandelbrot so incredibly famous is the fact that simple properties of the simplest possible non-linear iterated map: $$f_c: z \mapsto z^2+c$$ can produce such an incredibly complicated structure that not only requires sophistocated mathematical tools to understand but isn't even very well understood yet.

The set has two equvalent definitions, both relating to the same thing but in different ways. One is that $M$ consists of those values $c$ such that $f_c^n(0)$ remains bounded as $n \to \infty$, and this definition makes sense, and can be quite useful for a number of things. The other, equivalent, definition is that $M$ consists of those values $c$ such that $J(f_c)$, the Julia set for the map $f_c$ is connected. Even proving that these two defintitions are equivalent, while not "difficult" per se, requires some elementary, but not neccessarily obvious, results from complex analysis. A lot of properties of $M$ can only be derived easily from this second condition, (or from the first by proving it is equivalent to the second, but that doesn't really count) and connectedness is, at it's heart, a topological definition. Many characterizations come from the proof that a Julia set is either connected or contains nothing but disconnected points, and this dichotomy requires more than simple algebra as well. So without this you won't get the true beauty of this beast, and without the knowledge of geometric measure theory a number of incredible resuts (e.g. the Hausdorff dimension of the boundary of the set is 2) don't even make sense.

So ultimately yes, the Mandelbrot set stems from a very simple problem, but it requires a sophistocated set of tools to fully understand.

That being said, there are a number of results that are certainly accessible without topology or complex analysis. The first of which was referenced in the comments, that $M$ is bounded by the circle of radius 2.

Notice that M is bounded by the orange circle

This is quite easy to prove, although not quite "trivial". You should definitely be able to manage it by yourself if you haven't already. Simply think of where $f_c$ sends $0$ after the first iteration.

But don't stop there! There are plenty of other cool geometrical things on $M$ that don't require particularly complicated machinery. For example: if you read a little about bifurcation diagrams, specifically for $x^2 +c$ with $c \in \Bbb{R}$, you'll understand a little bit about chaos theory, and understand this diagram:

Bifurcation diagram

But this is the exact same function as generates the Mandelbrot set. So if you look at the negative real axis of M you should see a striking similarity:

negative real mandelbrot

And this knowledge of at least some of the structure of the Mandelbrot set comes only from the study of one very simple dynamic system, which you can analyse using only algebra and perhaps a little calculus. Fully understanding bifurcation theory does require a lot of work, but that isn't necessary to understand this one simple connection.

But in the end, understanding $M$ requires a lot of prerequisites, while observing fascinating properties of it requires nothing but a computer and curiosity. Perhaps fascination with some aspect of the fractal will lead you to learn challenging math in order to develop a deeper understanding.

A book for further reading geared towards students with nothing more than high school level math education would be The Computational Beauty of Nature by Flake which discusses a lot of topics tangential and related to the study of fractals.

share|cite|improve this answer
Nice answer +1. – mick Feb 11 '13 at 22:15

Do you know about Misiurewicz Points? They're polynomials roots on the M-set boundary. Here is a Question with some discussion of them along with a plot and some simple Mathematica code for calculating them.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.