Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Specifically, what academic level would one need to be at to fully understand Goldston-Pintz-Yildirim's work on twin primes? Undergraduate, Graduate, or PhD?

share|cite|improve this question
I would say undergraduate is enough - this article is very well written and is self-contained. A plus is that there isn't much specialized vocabulary in this article. (when compared to algebraic geometry, for example) – user27126 Jan 15 '13 at 1:12
Why the votes to close? – Michael Greinecker Jan 15 '13 at 14:08
up vote 3 down vote accepted

This is a rather subjective question, and it depends on specialization: I suspect there are "pre-docs" (even pre-"grads") studying number theory who would better understand the paper than some PhD-level mathematicians, in say, group theory. Mathematical maturity, and area (and level) of specialization is of greater importance than the degree one holds. It also depends how deeply you want to understand any published paper, including the paper you refer to (and what you mean by "fully" understand.)

A good look at the references will help indicate what prior knowledge and/or familiarity with such work is assumed, as will the abstract. References will often include work that may be a bit more general, and you can backtrack to that work, to check and see what level of familiarity is assumed to understand that work.

share|cite|improve this answer

Having an undergraduate degree in math from MIT, I'd have to sit down with this paper for a long time before I could understand it... if ever...

At this level of math I think it's less about what general academic level someone has and more about his or her specific area of expertise.

share|cite|improve this answer

Based on the link you have attached It doesn't seem like you need too much. The first 10 or so pages all made perfect sense to me (then again I've read like every prime related article on Wikipedia)

For this overall:

  1. Read Up on Primes on Wikipedia and click each link, one by one studying each of the pages, each time you come across a word or a term that you don't understand google it, or copy and paste it into Wolfram Alpha and learn it.

  2. Buy yourself a basic number theory book (ex: Art of Problem Solving Introduction to Number Theory) to get yourself started on understanding how a lot of this is done.

  3. Read up on some standard High School AP Statistics, and read up some mathematical notation ex: Infinite Product Notation, Infinite Sums, Inclusion - Exclusion...

Thats all the math you'll need to understand the paper. Now you'll just have to move through it slowly, reading each line one by one, and if ever you find a line that makes no sense look it up.


share|cite|improve this answer
timipueo basically sums it up very well... this type of document is geared towards those who are experts in the subject of primes... That has nothing to do with a degree etc... just a matter of how much time you have spent studying primes – frogeyedpeas Jan 15 '13 at 1:34

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.