Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

A subspace $A \subset X$ is called a retract of $X$ if there is a map $r: X \rightarrow A$ such that $r(a) = a$ for all $a \in A$. (Such a map is called a retraction.)

Proof. Let $x \notin A$ and $a =r(x) \in A$. Since $X$ is Hausdorff, $x$ and $a$ have disjoint neighborhoods $U$ and $V$, respectively. Then $r^{−1}(V \cap A) \cap U$ is a neighborhood of $x$ disjoint from $A$. (*) Hence, $A$ is closed.

I do not understand how "$r^{−1}(V \cap A) \cap U$ is a neighborhood of $x$ disjoint from $A$" implies that $A$ is closed. I would be grateful if someone could point me in te right direction.

share|cite|improve this question
Actually, I think it is more natural to prove this by noting that $A$ is the set of fixed points of $r$. – Harald Hanche-Olsen Jan 14 '13 at 19:12
And the set of fixed points of $r$ is necessarily closed in $X$? – omar Jan 14 '13 at 19:29
Yes. The set of fixed points is the inverse image of the diagonal in $X\times X$ under the continuous map $x\mapsto(x,r(x))$, and the diagonal is itself closed. (There are more direct proofs too, none of them really difficult.) – Harald Hanche-Olsen Jan 15 '13 at 11:55
Does anyone except me has the trouble understanding why $r^{-1}(V\cap A)$ is open in the first place? – mathreader Aug 10 '13 at 6:57
@mathreader: Since the image of $r$ is (contained in) $A$ already, $r^{-1}(V\cap A)=r^{-1}(V)$. – Harald Hanche-Olsen Aug 10 '13 at 8:48
up vote 2 down vote accepted

The proof shows that the complement of $A$ is open.

share|cite|improve this answer
Why is it true that $r^{−1}(V \cap A) \cap U$ is a neighborhood of $x$ disjoint from $A$, though? How do we know we can find a neighborhood U disjoint from A? – Ryker Mar 6 '13 at 4:07
@Ryker It is true because if $x$ belongs to that set, by definition $x\in U$ and $r(x)\in V$. Therefore $r(x)\ne x$, so $x\notin A$. – Harald Hanche-Olsen Mar 6 '13 at 7:07
Thanks! I actually managed to figure it out on my own in the meantime, but I figured I'd leave the question, so that if you answered someone else might find it useful, as well. – Ryker Mar 6 '13 at 7:37

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.