Let $G$ be finite group and d(G) be the minimal number of generators of $G$ and $H$ be subgroup of $G$. Then prove or disprove $$d(H)\leq d(G)?$$ What about abelian groups? For example is true for cyclic groups.
|
|
False. Since every finite group is a subgroup of some symmetric group $S_n$ (group of all n-element permutations under composition) and each symmetric group can be generated from two elements (rotate and swap_first), it suffices to find a finite group that cannot be generated from two elements. Consider the group of 3-bit numbers under bitwise addition (XOR) (isomorphic to $Z_2^3$). Then for any two generators $A$ and $B$, the four elements $\{0, A, B, A+B\}$ are closed under addition (and self-inverse), meaning that $A, B$ don't generate the whole group. Thus, $S_8$ has a pair of generators |
|||
|
|
|
There is a nice family of groups where $d(H)\leq d(G)$. In the finite case we have the following definition: a finite $p$-group $G$ is powerful if $p$ is odd and $G^p\leq [G,G]$, or if $p=2$ and $G^4\leq [G,G]$. Examples of these groups are the elementary abelian groups. It is a theorem that if $G$ is a powerful $p$-group then $d(H)\leq d(G)$ for any subgroup $H$ of $G$. You can look up the proof of this result in Analytic Pro-p Groups. |
||||
|
|
