Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am reading a document it says

A group realization is a map from elements of G to transformations of a space M that is a group homomorphism, i.e. it preserves the group multiplication law. Thus if $T:G \rightarrow T(M): g \mapsto T(g)$ where $T(g)$ is some transformation on M, then T is a homomorphism if $T(g_1 g_2) = T(g_1)T(g_2)$.

I have got a bad feeling about this definition.

If T(M) is transformations on M then how can $T$ also be a map from $G$ to $T(M)$?

This document page 4.

share|improve this question
2  
It's not a bad definition, it's a bad notation, because $T$ is playing two roles: it is the name of the transformation group of $M$, and it is also the name of the function from $G$ to the transformation group of $M$. Instead of calling the transformation group $T(M)$, call it something else, for example, $\mathrm{Tr}(M)$. Then $T\colon G\to\mathrm{Tr}(M)$ is a function from $G$ to $\mathrm{Tr}(M)$. –  Arturo Magidin Mar 18 '11 at 19:36
    
I suspected it. Would you post modified definition as an answer? Thanks! :) –  Pratik Deoghare Mar 18 '11 at 19:41
    
Done. –  Arturo Magidin Mar 18 '11 at 19:51

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

The problem here is really just the notation: $T$ is playing two roles, both the name of the group homomorphism from $G$ to the transformation group of $M$, and as part of the name of the group of transformations of $M$. Since the notes seem to often give special names to the group of transformations, depending on who $M$ is, a simple fix is just to change the generic name for this group.

Instead of using $T(M)$ to denote "a group of transformations $M$", call it something else, say $\mathrm{Tr}(M)$. Then $T\colon G\to \mathrm{Tr}(M)$ is a realization of $G$ if $T$ is a homomorphism from $G$ to a group of transformations of the a space $M$.

share|improve this answer
    
Why community wiki? –  Pratik Deoghare Mar 18 '11 at 19:54
    
@MachineCharmer: I posted it as a comment because I thought it was not "worthy enough" of full answer status. It's really just a simple observation. By making it a "community wiki" answer, you can mark it as accepted (so the site knows the answer has been answered), but I don't get any reputation from the (in my view rather minor) contribution. –  Arturo Magidin Mar 18 '11 at 19:56
    
wow! I will buy you a coffee someday.(/beer(if you prefer) :D –  Pratik Deoghare Mar 18 '11 at 20:11

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.