Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In isoparameteric finite element of second order tetrahedron element, the original coordinate $(x,y,z)$ would be transformed to standard coordinate $(\xi, \eta, \zeta)$ by a shape function. As a result, for any $(\xi_j, \eta_j, \zeta_j)$ in the element, the original coordinate $(x_j,y_j,z_j)$ can be calculated: $$ x_j=\sum_{i=1}^{10} N(i)\cdot x_i, $$ $$ y_j=\sum_{i=1}^{10}N(i)\cdot y_i, $$ $$ z_j=\sum_{i=1}^{10}N(i)\cdot z_i. $$ Now my question is: if I give a rotation to the original element, the $(x_j, y_j, z_j)$ is transformed to $(x_{jj}, y_{jj}, z_{jj})$, which can be calculated from $(\xi_{jj}, \eta_{jj}, \zeta_{jj})$, what's the relationship between $(\xi_j, \eta_j, \zeta_j)$ and $(\xi_{jj}, \eta_{jj}, \zeta_{jj})$? are they just the same? how to prove this relationship?

Thanks, Tang Laoya

share|cite|improve this question

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.