Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

How do you transform isoperimetric inequalities of a group to the of Riemann integrals of functions of the form $f\colon \mathbb{R}\rightarrow G$ where $G$ is a metric group so that being $\delta-$hyperbolic in the sense of Gromov is expressible via Riemann integration?

In other words, how do you define "being $\delta-$hyperbolic group" by using integrals in metric groups?

(Note: I am not interested in the "Riemann" part, so you are free to take commutative groups with lebesgue integration etc.)

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 6 down vote accepted

You can do this using metric currents in the sense of Ambrosio-Kirchheim. This is a rather new development of geometric measure theory, triggered by Gromov and really worked out only in the last decade. I should warn you that this is rather technical stuff and nothing for the faint-hearted.

Urs Lang has a set of nice lecture notes, where you can find most of the relevant references, see here.

My friend Stefan Wenger has done quite a bit of work on Gromov hyperbolic spaces and isoperimetric inequalities, his Inventiones paper Gromov hyperbolic spaces and the sharp isoperimetric constant seems most relevant. You can find a link to the published paper and his other work on his home page, the ArXiV-preprint is here.


I should add that I actually prefer to prove that a linear (or subquadratic) isoperimetric inequality implies $\delta$-hyperbolicity using a coarse notion of area (see e.g. Bridson-Haefliger's book) or using Dehn functions, the latter can be found in Bridson's beautiful paper The geometry of the word problem.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you Theo, I need some time to comprehend your message. –  niyazi Mar 18 '11 at 5:19
    
@niyazi: It is more a list of references addressing the second version of your question (and some variants) than an answer, but I think that this is the closest you can get. –  t.b. Mar 18 '11 at 5:23
    
The last paragraph of t.b.'s answer can be interpreted as a form of integration of functions $f:R\to X$ where $X$ is the Cayley 2-complex of a finitely presented group $G$. This is just a fancy way of saying that you compute the area of a closed curve in the Cayley graph by adding up the number of 2-cells of a disc map into the Cayley 2-complex spanned by that curve, and minimizing over all such disc maps. After all, integration is just summation. –  Lee Mosher May 22 '12 at 12:56
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.