Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Why are the objects of $\mathbf{Mat}_\mathbb K$ the natural numbers? I came across this in the context of a functor $F:\mathbf{FdVect}_\mathbb K\rightarrow\mathbf{Mat}_\mathbb K$ where we map arrows (linear maps) to their respective matrices in a given basis and each object $\mathbb K ^n$ just to $n$. This all makes sense to me, except that as far as I can see matrices do not have type $m\rightarrow n$ where $n,m\in\mathbb N$. The text (Categories for the Practising Physicist) makes the following comment:

it strongly emphasizes that objects are but labels with no internal structure.

however if we merely need a set with the right cardinality wouldn't $\mathbb N$ do just as well as $\{\mathbb K ^n:n\in\mathbb N\}$ for $\mathbf{FdVect}_\mathbb K$?

share|improve this question
4  
Sure. But using $n$ instead of $K^n$ "strongly emphasizes that objects are but labels with no internal structure." –  Zhen Lin Jan 13 '13 at 13:31
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

This is only definition.

How do you mean, 'matrices do not have type $m\to n$'? Actually, they have type $m\times n$, but that's it all about: interpret an $m\times n$ matrix as an $m\to n$ arrow in $\bf Mat_{\Bbb K}$.

share|improve this answer
    
I mean type in the sense of domain and codomain. The arrows in $\mathbf {FdVect}_\mathbb K$ are linear maps $A:\mathbb K^n-> \mathbb K^m$ which makes sense to me since those the $\mathbb K^n$ are the objects of $\mathbf {FdVect}_\mathbb K$. On the other hand I don't know what it would even mean for something (let alone a matrix) to have domain $n$ and codomain $m$. –  Sean D Jan 18 '13 at 15:48
    
It is just a formalism. A category is a quiver (directed graph) with composition, and a quiver is a pair of functions between any two sets: $c,d:E\to V$. In this case, an 'edge' (element of $E$) is a matrix $A$, say $n\times m$. Then the 'codomain' and 'domain' functions are defined as $c(A):=n$, $d(A):=m$ (or the other way around, I never know:). They are just abstract stuffs. –  Berci Jan 18 '13 at 20:47
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.