Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have two independent, identically distributed normal random variables $X \sim N(0,\sigma^2)$, $Y \sim N(0,\sigma^2)$. I want to know

$$Pr[X-Y>4\sigma \text{ and } X<3\sigma \text { and } Y<3\sigma]$$

Of course, the condition $Y<3\sigma$ seems to be redundant, since we must have $Y<-\sigma$ in order to have $3\sigma>X>4\sigma+Y$. I also know the fact that $X-Y$ is itself a normal random variable with $X-Y \sim N(0,2\sigma^2)$. However, $X-Y$ and $X$ are not independent, so I don't know how to separate out the "and"s in the probability condition...

share|cite|improve this question
The last condition seems indeed redundant. Are you sure you didn't forget some absolute values? – Eckhard Jan 11 '13 at 23:58
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Let $g(x)=\frac1{\sqrt{2\pi}}\mathrm e^{-x^2/2}$, then the probability $p$ you are interested in is $$ p=\int_{-\infty}^3g(x)\int_{-\infty}^{x-4}g(y)\mathrm dy\,\mathrm dx=\frac1{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^3\int_{-\infty}^{x-4}\mathrm e^{-(x^2+y^2)/2}\mathrm dy\,\mathrm dx. $$ Obviously, $\Phi(1)\Phi(3)\leqslant p\leqslant\Phi(3)$ but I see no reason why $p$ should have an analytic expression.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks! Did you assume $\sigma=1$? Also, where can I read about the function $\Phi$ (which I assume bounds the probability $p$)? – jamaicanworm Jan 12 '13 at 21:21
The result does not depend on the value of sigma. // About Phi: try WP. – Did Jan 12 '13 at 22:03
Yes, as already mentioned. – Did Jan 14 '13 at 9:31

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.