Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Lets assume that for every $x,y,z$ that belong to an $A$ , $(x+2y)$ and $(y+2z)$ can be divided by $3$.If we want to prove that $(x+2z)$ can also be divided by $3$, is it ok to do the next steps ?

$(x+2y),(y+2z)$ can be divided by $3$, so lets take the sum of them:$(x+2y)+(y+2z)$ = $3y+(x+2z)$ And here we come into conclusion that the sum of them is obviously divided by $3$, $ 3y$ can be divided by $3$ obviously, can we say the same about $(x+2z)$ (that can be divided by $3$ according to the above sum)

Thanks.

share|improve this question
    
Yes, this is fine. –  Brian M. Scott Jan 11 '13 at 15:10
1  
Fine and ok. Now try to re-write your question using LaTeX. Look at the FAQ section for directions. –  DonAntonio Jan 11 '13 at 15:12
    
Ah, too bad Amzoti already did that in your place...I've erased Amzoti's editting so that you can learn and do it yourself. BTW, +1 for showing your work. –  DonAntonio Jan 11 '13 at 15:17
1  
yea sorry about that ^_^ ,i will be using latex in my next questions, just had a discrete math exam and i was worried about failing :p , but now its ok –  p0ffer Jan 11 '13 at 15:20
1  
the original exercise was to show that $(x+2y)$ is an equivalence relation :p –  p0ffer Jan 11 '13 at 15:24

1 Answer 1

To be more explicit: If $x+2y=3a$ and $y+2z=3b$ then $x+2z=3(a+b-y)$ (by the equation you have shown and assuming "an $A$" means something like "an abelian group $A$").

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.