Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $f$ and $g$ be two functions with derivatives in some interval containing $0$, where $g$ is positive. Also

$$f(x)=o(g(x))~as~x \rightarrow0$$

Prove or dissprove:

1) $$\int_0^xf(t)dt=o\left(\int_0^xg(t)dt\right)$$ 2) $$f'(x)=o(g'(x))$$

Now considering the first, my reasoning is as follows:


Now the first member on the right will tend to $0$. Second will also seems to converge to $0$ (though I am unsure of that). And the limit should converge to $0$? I realize this is a very weak reasoning. How could I make it more precise?

Considering the second problem I am quite clueless though I am quite sure it should converge to $0$ :) Any hints?

share|cite|improve this question
For 2: Try $f(x) = \sin(x), g(x) = x$ (or if you prefer, $g(x) = x+1$ since it's positive on an interval containing 0 - that's a detail here.)? The point is that knowing bounds on something doesn't give you any bounds on how much it can 'wiggle'. – Steven Stadnicki Jan 10 '13 at 22:17
"Now considering hte first, my reasoning is as follows:..." Apply L'Hopital's rule for an immediate answer. – Alex R. Jan 11 '13 at 1:21
You are doing fine with the first one, but you should apply L'hopital's rule correctly. You should have $ \lim_{x\to0}\frac{\int_0^xf(t)dt}{\int_0^xg(t)dt}= \lim_{x\to0}\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}=0 $. – Mhenni Benghorbal Jun 25 '13 at 12:20

1) Begin by writing down the meaning of $o$: for any $\epsilon>0$ there is $\delta>0$ such tha t $$|f(x)|\le \epsilon \, g(x) \quad \text{for all }\ x\in (-\delta,\delta) \tag1$$ Then use the integral triangle inequality: $$\left|\int_0^x f(t)\,dt\right|\le \int_0^x |f(t)|\,dt \le \epsilon\,\int_0^x g(t)\,dt$$

2) Already answered by Steven Stadnicki: the functions $f(x)=\sin x$ and $g(x)=x+1$ satisfy $f=o(g)$ but fail $f'=o(g')$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Considering the second - I can not use the L'Hopital's rule yet, so I have to stick to other means. I think I found away, but I need help confirming weather such approach is viable:

Let $F(x)=\int_0^xf(t)dt$ and $G(x)=\int_0^xg(t)dt$. By definition:

$$\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{F(x+h)-F(x)}{h}=F'(x)+o(1)$$ $$\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{G(x+h)-G(x)}{h}=G'(x)+o(1)$$

So since

$$0=\lim_{x\to0}\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}=\lim_{x\to 0}\frac{F'(x)+o(1)}{G'(x)+o(1)}$$

It follows that $$\int_0^xf(t)dt=o\left(\int_0^xg(t)dt\right)$$

Is this correct?

For the first - Steven's example is enough to disprove my "quite sure" position. But how could I make it more formal? Can not find any ideas.

share|cite|improve this answer
so could anybody verify my reasoning and/or provide any hints regarding other part of the problem? thanks! – Sarunas Jan 13 '13 at 21:25
I do not understand the role of $o(1)$ in $\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{F(x+h)-F(x)}{h}=F'(x)+o(1)$. By definition of derivative, $\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{F(x+h)-F(x)}{h}=F'(x)$. Also, "it follows that" appears to be based on the L'Hopital's rule which you said you can't use. – ˈjuː.zɚ79365 Jun 25 '13 at 12:01

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.