Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The general and probably complete solution to $a^2+(b-1)^2 = (b)^2 is (2v+1)^2+(2v(v+1))^2 = (v^2+(v+1)^2)^2$ We get the triples $(a,b-1,b) = (3,4,5), (5,12,13), (7,24,5^2),...,(41,840,29^2),...,(239,28560,13^4),...$

If we only want those b that are also squares, we must solve the Pell like equation $a^2 -2b^2 =-1$ whose $(a,b)$ solutions beginning with the trivial $(1,1)$ are $(7,5), (41,29), (239,13^2),...$ given by the recurrent relation :$ a(n+1) = 3a(n) + 4b(n); b(n+1) = 2a(n) + 3b(n)$. What is the general solution, if known, to $a^2 -2b^4 = -1 $?

share|cite|improve this question
The general theory says it will have only finitely many solutions. – Gerry Myerson Jan 10 '13 at 17:33
Why did you edit me , mister Gerry Myerson, so shortly after i published my question? What are you doing without my consentment for such a insufficient answer? – user55514 Jan 10 '13 at 21:30
I edited you because you don't know how to spell "diophantine". If you don't like being edited without consent, you've come to the wrong website. And that's Doctor Myerson to you. – Gerry Myerson Jan 11 '13 at 1:48
Always be scared by strong personalities, Mister Myerson. I am not suffering though from a lack of knowledge but from some kind of dislexia when i write fast; sorry Doctor. – user55514 Jan 11 '13 at 4:00
Apology accepted. Anyway, you can see the edit history by clicking on the time/date/whatever next to the word, "edited"; you'll find someone else did most of the editing, and it was done to improve the formatting (to make a^2 look like $a^2$, for example). Regular users are encouraged to do this type of editing. – Gerry Myerson Jan 11 '13 at 23:40
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Mordell, Diophantine Equations, page 271, writes, "...for the special case $$y^2=2x^4-1$$ it has been known for two centuries that solutions are given by $(x,y)=(1,1)$ and $(13,239)$. It was proved by Ljunggren that these are the only positive integer solutions. The proof is exceedingly complicated." Mordell gives the citation, Zur Theorie der Gleichung $x^2+1=Dy^4$, Avh. Norske Vid. Akad. Oslo No. 5 1 (1942).

Guy, Unsolved Problems In Number Theory, 3rd edition, Problem D6 is "An elementary solution of $x^2=2y^4-1$." Guy cites Steiner and Tzanakis, Simplifying the solution of Ljunggren's equation $X^2+1=2Y^4$, J Number Theory 37 (1991) 123-132, and writes, "Whether Steiner & Tzanakis have simplified the solution may be a matter of taste; they use the theory of linear forms in logarithms of algebraic numbers."

Guy also cites a proof by Chen Jian-Hua, which he calls "unconventional." The bibliographic details are, A new solution of the Diophantine equation $X^2+1=2Y^4$, J Number Theory 48 (1994) 62-74 and A note on the Diophantine equation $x^2+1=dy^4$, Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 64 (1994) 1-10.

I'd suggest also looking at Wikipedia on Ljunggren.

And there's more: Konstantinos A. Draziotis, The Ljunggren equation revisited, Colloq. Math. 109 (2007), no. 1, 9–11.

Michael A. Bennett, Irrationality via the hypergeometric method, Diophantine analysis and related fields—DARF 2007/2008, 7–18, AIP Conf. Proc., 976, Amer. Inst. Phys., Melville, NY, 2008.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks for the good information, Gerry. I did not know it. We can then deduce almost immediately (am i wrong?) hat the equation a^4 -2b^4 = -1 has no integer non trivial solutions since 239 is not a square. I would be interested in knowing all the solutions, if there are, to a^2 - 2b^2n = -1 or alternatively to know all the solutions to a^2n - 2b^2 = -1 with the intention of proving a^2n - 2b^2n = -1 has no non trivial solutions. I believe, but could be wrong, proving a^(2n+1) - 2b^(2n+1) = -1 has no non trivial solutions might be harder. – user55514 Jan 15 '13 at 18:01
Now here's where aesthetics becomes mathematics. You write, b^2n. How is one to know whether you mean $b^{2n}$ or $b^2n$? If you plan to use this site regularly, please do yourself and others a favor, and learn a little about how to use TeX to format your mathematics here. – Gerry Myerson Jan 15 '13 at 23:35
You are half right, i am half wrong here. I should have put parenthesis; or brackets, i am not sure of the sense you give north by northwest (seen from where i´m living and belong to, this old and southerener Europe we love) to parenthesis: b^(2n). Furthermore i should have written b^(2*n) and 2*b^(2*n) to avoid any confusion (2b and 2n could be variables distinct from b and from n), but i was too lazy. I am an amateur and never used TeX, but i´ll try next time. – user55514 Jan 16 '13 at 9:54
Yet if you edit somebody to change the meaning of what he/she wrote, this seems to me less acceptable and near to censorship, even though the intention was good, to put it better and with a better style. But i think all is OK now. – user55514 Jan 16 '13 at 9:55
for(v=1,10^10,if(issquare((v^2+(v+1)^2),&n)&ispower(n),print([v,n]))) [119, 169] time = 3h, 7min, 887 ms. This maldroit very short program in Pari gp – user55514 Jan 16 '13 at 14:12

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.