Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I want to read hyperbolic geometry. Can any one suggest some good books on the topic.

share|improve this question
    
What is your background? –  user38268 Jan 10 '13 at 11:13
    
I have knowledge in complex analysis, basic functional analysis, topology,basic algebra –  Phani Raj Jan 10 '13 at 11:17

6 Answers 6

Geometry and Topology of Three-Manifolds by Bill Thurston, edited by Silvio Levy.

share|improve this answer

I can recommend Low-Dimensional Geometry by Francis Bonahon and Chapter 2 of Thurston's Three-Dimensional Geometry and Topology (ed. Levy).]

You could go on to Al Marden's Outer Circles or Benedetti and Petronio's Lectures on Hyperbolic Geometry if that whets your appetite.

share|improve this answer

A professor of mine suggested Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Geometries: Development and History by Marvin J. Greenberg when I asked him the same question.

share|improve this answer

There's a short one called "About Lobachevski's Geometry" By Smogorzhevski. I translated the name from the Spanish copy I have, so it could be called differently. Sadly, that's the only one I know, because I haven't studied a lot about this geometry, and all I know was from general or euclidean geometry books that had a couple of chapters about introduction to non-euclidean geometries. That book is for beginners though, so with the background you say you have, you won't have any trouble at all with that.

share|improve this answer

You may enjoy Chapter 6 of Needham's Visual Complex Analysis.

share|improve this answer

There's 56-page introductory paper on hyperbolic geometry by Cannon, Floyd, Kenyon, and Parry which is absolutely excellent. You can download it from Kenyon's web page:

Cannon, Floyd, Kenyon, and Parry, Hyperbolic Geometry.

Note that this paper is much more directed towards the modern point of view than most sources, and is not at all interested in synthetic (or axiomatic) geometry.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.