Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Can anyone check my proof and let me know if I made some mistakes, please?

Let $R$ be an integral domain, let $K$ be its field of fraction Let $M=R^{\oplus A}$ be a free module on $R$ with basis $A$. View $M$ as a subset of $K^{\oplus A}$. Let $S$ be a subset of M.

Q : Show that if $S$ is linearly independent on $R$, then so it is on $K$.

I tried the following:[contrapositive]

Assume $S$ is NOT linearly independent on $K$, then there exist $s_1,\ldots,s_n$ in $S$, and $a_1,\ldots, a_n$ in $K$ not all of the $a_i$'s are zeros such that $a_1s_1+\cdots+a_ns_n=0$. Write every $a_i$ as a fraction i.e. $ \displaystyle a_i= \frac{u_i }{v_i}$ where $u_i$ and $v_i$ are in $R$ and $v_i\neq 0$ .

Let $d= v_1v_2\ldots v_n$, then $d\neq 0$ because $R$ is integral domain. Multiply by $d$ $$d (a_1 s_1+\cdots +a_n s_n)=0$$ and then get $$c_1s_1+\cdots+c_ns_n=0$$ where $\displaystyle c_i=d \frac{u_i}{v_i}\in R$ and not all of the $c_i$'s are zeros. This will imply $S$ is linearly independent on $R$. Hence the statement is true.

Thank you.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Yes, your argument is correct. In fact it works more generally to show that if $S$ is an $R$-linearly independent subset of any $R$-module $M$, then $S \otimes 1$ is a $K$-linearly independent subset of the $K$-module $M \otimes_R K$. That is, you do not need $M$ to be a free $R$-module.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.