Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

How do I go about proving the following theorem ?

Let $f\in K[T]$ have degree $n$ and splitting field $L/K$. Then we have $$ [L:K]=n!\ \Longrightarrow \ f\text{ is irreducible and Gal}(L/K)\cong S_n.$$

I managed to prove that $f$ has to be irreducible, but I'm stuck showing that $\text{Gal}(f/K)\cong S_n$.

(Some things I know, that might be useful in the proof: The Galois group of $f$ has to be, thanks to irreducibility, a transitive subgroup of $S_n$; $S_n$ is transitive.
I already browsed through Dummit's book and M. Artins book on algebra but couldn't find anything that would help me.)

share|improve this question
7  
How many subgroups of $S_n$ of order $n!$ are there? –  Hagen von Eitzen Jan 8 '13 at 19:14
    
@HagenvonEitzen Well...one...but how does that help me ? –  user47580 Jan 8 '13 at 20:47

2 Answers 2

up vote 10 down vote accepted

Let $f$ be a polynomial of degree $n$ over a field $K$ and $E$ its splitting field. Assume that $E$ is a Galois extension and let $\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_n$ be the roots of $f$. Any $K$-automorphism of $E$ is determined by its action on $\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_n$ since $\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_n$ generate $E$ over $K$. We also know that for any $K$-automorphism $\sigma$ of $E$ that $\sigma(\alpha_i)=\alpha_j$ for some $j$. In particular we see that $\mathrm{Gal}(K/E)$ provides a faithful group action on $\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_n$. This means that $\mathrm{Gal}(K/E)$ embeds into $S_n$.

Now concerning your problem. First observe that if $f$ had repeated roots $L/K$ could not have degree $n!$, so $L/K$ is a separable extension. We have that $L/K$ is normal because it is a splitting field so it is a Galois extension. So it makes sense to talk about $\mathrm{Gal}(K/L)$. By the argument in the previous paragraph we know that $\mathrm{Gal}(K/L)$ embeds in $S_n$, but $\mathrm{Gal}(K/L)$ has order $n!$ so it must be that the embedding is in fact an isomorphism.

Edit: Rewrote answer adding more details.

share|improve this answer
    
Could you please be a little more explicit ? –  user47580 Jan 8 '13 at 21:09
    
@user47580 I've rewritten the answer to include more details. Let me know if there are any specific parts you don't follow. –  JSchlather Jan 8 '13 at 21:24
    
Hey, thanks a lot. After thinking about it a bit, a single thing is still unclear to me though: How can we rigorously infer from $f$ having repeated roots in $L/K$ that its degree has to be $n!$ ? –  user47580 Jan 8 '13 at 22:52
    
Suppose that $f$ has a repeated root $\alpha$. Then $f(x)=(x-\alpha)^2g(x)$ over $K(\alpha)$. The splitting field $E$ of $g(x)$ over $K(\alpha)$ is also the splitting field of $f$. Now $[E:K(\alpha)]\leq (n-2)!$ and $[K(\alpha):K]\leq n$ so $[E:K]\leq n (n-2)!<n!$. –  JSchlather Jan 8 '13 at 22:56
    
Why do we consider the splitting field $E$ of $g$ of $K(\alpha)$ ? Can some coefficients of $g$ also be $\alpha$ ? –  user47580 Jan 8 '13 at 23:16

(I think) I see two possible points of confusion you're having, so I'll try to straighten them out.

Firstly, in your edit, you've added that you know that the Galois group must be a subgroup of $S_n$. Now in Hagen von Eitzen's comment, he asks how many subgroups of $S_n$ (i.e., potnetial Galois groups) have order $n!$ (as required in your problem). So how many potential Galois groups are there, and what are they?

Secondly, in your comments to Jacob Schlather's (great) answer, you're asking good questions, but I get the feeling you've missed the point of the first paragraph in his answer. What he's saying is, because the elements of the Galois group must permute the roots of $f$, and $f$ has $n$ (not necessarily distinct) roots, each permutation is a permutation on $n$ (not necessarily distinct) letters. Now the key is that if those $n$ letters are not distinct, then there cannot be $n!$ permutations. Perhaps it's helpful to think about it this way: not counting repetition, there are $n!$ permutations of all the roots, so if some of the roots were repeated, say $r_1$ and $r_2$, then every permutation swapping those two, would be the same as another permutation that has the same effect on the rest of the roots, but doesn't swap $r_1$ and $r_2$, and so you have fewer than $n!$ distinct permutations (i.e., automorphisms!).

Thus, as $L/K$ is Galois, we know $|\operatorname{Gal}(L/K)| = [L:K] = n!$, and so if any of the roots were repeated, there would be fewer than $n!$ (permutations) automorphisms of $L$ fixing $K$, contradicting the hypotheses.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.