Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $M$ and $N$ be submanifolds of $\mathbb R^n$. I am trying to prove that for almost every $x\in \mathbb R^n$, $M+x$ and $N$ intersect transversely. Intuitively, transversality is a "generic" condition, so if we slightly change $x$, we can make the intersection transverse. However, I do not know how to make this intuition precise. Can anyone explain?

share|cite|improve this question
Transversality requires that the tangent spaces of the submanifolds at the intersection point span the tangent space of the ambient space $\mathbb R^n$. Is this the case for two generic linear subspaces of $\mathbb R^n$ of appropriate dimension? – Tabes Bridges Jan 8 '13 at 19:28
Are you allowed to quote Sard's theorem? Try to define a smooth map on $\mathbb{R}^n$ which is critical at exactly those $x$ for which $M+x$ is not transverse to $N$. – Neal Jan 8 '13 at 19:53
Can you give me a little more detail on how to do this? – user15464 Jan 8 '13 at 20:12
@user15464 I have turned my hint into an answer-hint with more detail. – Neal Jan 10 '13 at 19:23
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Let's define a map which is critical exactly when $M+x$ is not transverse to $N$. Then you can throw Sard's theorem at the problem and conclude that the non-transverse points have measure zero.

Define $f:M\times\mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}^n$ by $(m,x)\mapsto m + x$. Define $B = f^{-1}(N)$. Now let $g$ be the projection of $B$ onto the $\mathbb{R}^n$ coordinate.

The idea here is to fix $N$ and let $f$ capture the motion of $M$ through $\mathbb{R}^n$. The preimage of $N$ under $f$, what we're calling $B$, we can think of as a family of sets $(M+x)\cap N\subset M$ parametrized by $\mathbb{R}^n$. You want to verify that for almost every $x$, $(M+x)\pitchfork N$, i.e., at each point $p$ of intersection $(M+x)\cap N$, $T_pM + T_pN = T_p\mathbb{R}^n$.

I'll let you take it from here, unless you'd like me to finish the problem. The gist of what's left is relating the surjectivity of $dg$ to the transveraslity of $M$ and $N$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Can you finish the proof? I appear to be running into a problem since the argument requires that $B$ be a submanifold of $M\times\mathbb R^n$, and for this to be the case I believe we need some sort of transversality hypothesis to begin with. – user15464 Jan 11 '13 at 1:10
@user15464 I'll try to find time to finish it off from my notes (it's a problem in Guillemin/Pollack). – Neal Jan 11 '13 at 2:14

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.