Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am attempting to extend this question, which says that for a nonzero continuous $f$ with compact support on the real line, the Fourier transform cannot decay exponentially. Suppose $f \in C_0(\mathbb{R}^n)$ and let $\alpha$ be a multi-index with $|\alpha|=m$. Extending robojohn's answer to that question, suppose as a contradiction that $|\hat f(\xi)|\leq Ce^{-k|\xi|}$ for some positive constants $C$ and $k$. Then by Fourier inversion, $$ |D^{\alpha}f(x)| \leq \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} Ce^{-k|\xi|}(2\pi|\xi|)^m \; d\xi = C\frac{(2\pi)^m(m+n-1)!}{k^{m+n}}. $$ This matches the previous estimate if we take $n=1$. In this case, you can use the Hadamard formula to claim that $f$ must be real analytic at every point on the real line, thus $f$ must be identically zero.

Can the above estimate be used to show that $f\equiv0$ in the general case $n>1$? I believe my knowledge of power series in several variables is lacking. If not, how to show that for $f \in C_0(\mathbb{R}^n)$, the Fourier transform cannot decay exponentially?

share|improve this question
    
Technical remark: for many people, myself included, $C_0(\mathbb R^n)$ means the closure of the set of compactly supported functions in $C(\mathbb R^n)$. In other words, these are the functions that "vanish at infinity", like the Gaussian. E.g., Wikipedia uses this convention. The space of compactly supported functions is usually written as $C_c(\mathbb R^n)$ (sometimes $C_{00}$, although the latter is more common for sequences). –  user53153 Jan 7 '13 at 21:51
    
I actually prefer the $C_c$ convention. I must have been recently reading something which uses the other convention. Which reminds me, I haven't picked up a copy of Rudin in a few days! –  dls Jan 7 '13 at 23:40

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Let $g(t):=f(x_1,\dots,x_{n-1},t)$ for fixed $x_1,\dots,x_{n-1}$. By the previous estimate for $\alpha:=(0,\dots,0,p)$, that for all $t$ $$|g^{(p)}(t)|\leqslant C\frac{(2\pi)^p(p+n-1)!}{k^{p+n}},$$ so the Taylor series of $g$ has a radius of convergence $\leqslant \frac{2\pi}k$ everywhere. This implies, as $g$ has compact support, that $g(t)=0$ for all $t\in\Bbb R$. We conclude as the $x_j$ are arbitrary.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.