Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

How could I define the segre embedding of three projective spaces? Usually in references only the Segre embedding of two projective spaces are defined:

$\mathbb{P}^n \times \mathbb{P}^m \rightarrow \mathbb{P}^N$, $N=(n+1) (m+1)-1$ where the coordinates of $\mathbb{P}^N$ are $[u_{00},u_{01},...,u_{n+1,m+1}]=[x_0y_0,x_0y_1,...,x_{n+1}y_{m+1}]$ and the $u_{ij}$ satisfies $u_{ij}u_{kl}-u_{il}u_{kj}=0$.

Thanks in advance.

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers

The general Segre embedding discussed in EGA I$_{\text{new}}$, 9.8 (which I quite like because it is coordinate-free and transparent) can be generalized without effort as follows: Let $S$ be a scheme, and consider quasi-coherent sheaves $\mathcal{E}_1,\dotsc,\mathcal{E}_n$ on $S$. Then there is a closed immersion of $S$-schemes

$$\mathbb{P}(\mathcal{E}_1) \times_S \dotsc \times_S \mathbb{P}(\mathcal{E}_n) \hookrightarrow \mathbb{P}(\mathcal{E}_1 \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_S} \dotsc \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_S} \mathcal{E}_n),$$

given on $X$-valued points by $((\mathcal{L}_1,s_1),\dotsc,(\mathcal{L}_n,s_n)) \mapsto (\mathcal{L}_1 \otimes \dotsc \otimes \mathcal{L}_n,s_1 \otimes \dotsc \otimes s_n)$ (where $\mathcal{L}_i$ is invertible on $X$, $p : X \to S$ is the structural morphism and $s_i : p^* \mathcal{E}_i \to \mathcal{L}_i$ is an epimorphism). In particular, for all $k_1,\dotsc,k_n \in \mathbb{N}$ there is a closed immersion

$$\mathbb{P}^{k_1}_S \times_S \dotsc \times_S \mathbb{P}^{k_n}_S \hookrightarrow \mathbb{P}^{(k_1+1) \cdot \dotsc \cdot (k_n+1)-1}_S.$$

It corresponds to the graded quasi-coherent ideal $\subseteq \mathcal{O}_S[(x_{i_1,\dotsc,i_n})_{0 \leq i_p \leq k_p}]$ generated by the relations $x_{i_1,\dotsc,i_{p-1},a,i_{p+1},\dotsc,i_n} \cdot x_{i_1,\dotsc,i_{p-1},b,i_{p+1},\dotsc,i_n} = x_{i_1,\dotsc,i_{p-1},b,i_{p+1},\dotsc,i_n} \cdot x_{i_1,\dotsc,i_{p-1},a,i_{p+1},\dotsc,i_n}$.

share|improve this answer
1  
Of course, this coincides with the suggestion by Fredrik Meyer. –  Martin Brandenburg Jan 7 '13 at 22:44
    
Thanks Martin and Fredrik. I'm gonna try to translate to a physicist point of view what you said, because I don't know anything about schemes.My knowledge of AG is at best restricted to the first capter of Hartshorne. Let us consider for example $\mathbb{P}^2\times \mathbb{P}^2 \times \mathbb{P}^2$ with coordinates $[w_0:w_1,w_2;x_0:x_1:x_2;y_0:y_1:y_2]$. The Segre embedding of $\mathbb{P}^2 \times \mathbb{P}^2$ is a map defined by $[x_0:x_1:x_2;y_0:y_1:y_2]\rightarrow [u_{00}:...:u_{22}]=[x_0y_0:..:x_2y_2]$ –  atnemip Jan 8 '13 at 18:54
    
Now I define the Segre embedding of $\mathbb{P}^2 \times \mathbb{P}^8$ by, $[w_0:w_1,w_2;u_{00}:...:u_{22}]\rightarrow [z_{000}:...:z_{222}]=[w_0u_{00}:...:w_2z_{22}]$ where the $z_{ijk}$ are coordinates of a $\mathbb{P}^{26}$. Is that correct? What would be now the image? Thank you so much for help. –  atnemip Jan 8 '13 at 18:55
    
I have written down the defining relations of the image. And as I said, you don't have to apply the usual Segre embedding twice. You can (and should) do it on one step. –  Martin Brandenburg Jan 9 '13 at 4:16
add comment

You could do the usual Segre embedding twice. That is, first embed $\mathbb{P}^n \times \mathbb{P}^m \times \mathbb{P}^q \to \mathbb{P}^{N} \times \mathbb{P}^q$, with $N=(n+1)(m+1)-1$ and then embed $\mathbb{P}^n \times \mathbb{P}^q \to \mathbb{P}^M$, with $M=(N+1)(q+1)-1=(n+1)(m+1)(q+1)-1$.

share|improve this answer
    
thanks, Fredrik. I tought about this, but the problem is that the variables of $\mathbb{P}^N$ are constrained by $u_{ij}u_{kl}−u_{il}u_{kj}=0$, and I don't know how to deal with this. –  atnemip Jan 7 '13 at 15:15
1  
The variables don't satisfy this (it is just $\mathbb{P}^N$), they only satisfy it on the image of the embedding. –  Martin Brandenburg Jan 7 '13 at 22:45
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.