Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am reading some texts on projective geometry but I am still confused about some easy exercises. I found the following one:

$P_1=[0:1:2:3], P_2=[0:1:2:4], P_3=[1:1:1:1]$ are three points in $\mathbb RP^3$

Now there two things I would like to show that $E=<P_1,P_2,P_3>_{proj}$ is a projective plane and I would like to determine $a_i$ such that $E=\{[x_0:x_1:x_2:x_3]\in\mathbb RP^3:a_0x_0+a_1x_1+a_2x_2+a_3x_3=0\}$

I think the first thing to is to write $<P_1,P_2,P_3>_{proj}$ explicitly as a plane, but I have no idea how to do it, may you could help me with that problem.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

A start: You have $3$ linear equations in the four "unknowns" $a_0,a_1,a_2,a_3$. For example, from the first point we get $0\cdot a_0+1\cdot a_1+2\cdot a_2+3\cdot a_3=0$.

Find a non-zero solution of the system, in an ad hoc manner, or by row reduction. As usual in the coordinatized projective world, if $(a_0,a_1,a_2,a_3)$ is a solution, so is $(ka_0,ka_1,ka_2,ka_3)$ for any non-zero $k$.

Added: So we get the system of equations $$a_1+2a_2+3a_3=0,\qquad a_1+2a_2+4a_3=0,\qquad a_0+a_1+a_2+a_3=0.$$ From the first two equations, by subtraction, $a_3=0$. Let $a_2=t$. Then from the first equation $a_1=-2t$. From the third equation, we have $a_0-2t+t=0$, so $a_0=t$. That gives the general solution $(t,-2t,t,0)$. Choose for example $t=1$ (any non-zero $t$ will do). We conclude that we can take $a_0=1$, $a_1=-2$, $a_2=1$, $a_3=0$. We took advantage of the fact that the numbers we were given are very simple. For messier numbers, formal row-reduction might be better. Certainly it would be if we step up dimensions by $1$ or $2$.

share|improve this answer
    
Then I get: $a_0+a_1+a_2+a_3=0$ and $a_1+2a_2$, therefore the general solution $(a-b,-2a,a,b)$ for $a,b$ arbitrary. What can I do next? –  Montaigne Jan 6 '13 at 17:39
    
@Montaigne: I have added a full computation to the post. didn't want to try it in a comment, too hard to proofread comments. –  André Nicolas Jan 6 '13 at 17:53
    
Thank you, but why do we know that $E=<P_1,P_2,P_3>_{proj}$ is a projective plane? –  Montaigne Jan 6 '13 at 18:10
    
Details depend on how subplane has been defined in your course. It may have been simply defined as the set of points whose (homogeneous) coordinates satisfy an equation of shape $ax_0+bx_1+cx_2+dx_3=0$, in which case you are finished. Or you can think of it as obtained by linear mapping from the simplest subplane $x_3=0$. –  André Nicolas Jan 6 '13 at 18:21
    
Thank you very much, I also put another projective geometry question online, may you could help me also with that: math.stackexchange.com/questions/271688/… –  Montaigne Jan 6 '13 at 18:32

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.