Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Given a manifold $M$ with boundary $\partial M \neq \varnothing$, when can we form a manifold $\tilde M$ from $M$ by collapsing the boundary? In the examples I've considered it seems like collapsing each component of the boundary to a separate point will result in a manifold.

Obviously we can't collapse a disconnected boundary to a single point, e.g. $M = S^1\times [0,1]$ with $\partial M = S^1 \times \{0,1\}$, since the quotient here will be homeomorphic to a "pinched" torus with one of the noncontractible $S^1$ collapsed. However if we collapse $S^1 \times \{0\}$ and $S^1 \times \{1\}$ to separate points, then the result will be the suspension $SS^1 \approx S^2$.

I believe that $(M,\partial M)$ will be a good pair due to the existence of a collar neighborhood, so we should have $H_i(M,\partial M) \cong \tilde{H}_i(M/ \partial M)$, and if $M$ compact and orientable, then by Lefschetz Duality we also have $H_i(M,\partial M) \cong H^{n-i}(M,\varnothing) \cong H^{n-i}(M)$.

Anyhow, I'm quite sure where that gets us, and I have yet failed to construct a counterexample from my repertoire of spaces.

share|cite|improve this question
What happens when you collapse $\partial(D^2\times S^1)$ to a point? In particular, what is the link of the point to which you collapse the boundary? – Neal Jan 5 '13 at 20:18
Your repertoire of spaces surely contains some manifold whose boundary is not a disjoint union of spheres! – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Jan 5 '13 at 20:23
up vote 4 down vote accepted

From what I understand, you are asking: Giving a manifold with boundary $M$, with $\partial M = N_0 \sqcup \ldots \sqcup N_k$, when does the topological space $\tilde M$ obtained by collapsing each $N_i$ to a point $x_i$ admit a manifold structure?

(1) Unless each $N_i$ is a sphere, $\tilde M$ will not be a manifold. This is because in a manifold, any point needs to have a punctured neighborhood equivalent to $S^{n-1} \times \mathbb{R}$, where $n$ is the dimension of the manifold. But because the collapsed point $x_i \in \tilde M$ corresponding to $N_i$ is (by collaring the boundary, for instance) the cone point of a cone over $N_i$, its deleted neighborhood will be equal to $N_i \times \mathbb{R}$.*

(2) I know you haven't talked about smoothness, but just in case: Even if each $N_i$ is a sphere, there may not be a unique smooth structure on this collapse. For instance, if $M = S^3 \times [0,\infty)$, collapsing the boundary gives a copy of $\mathbb{R}^4$, which admits many smooth structures compatible with the $M$ with which you began.

*Actually, there's a question of whether a manifold $N'$ diffeomorphic to $S^3 \times \mathbb{R}$ can be diffeomorphic to $N_i \times \mathbb{R}$ for some $N_i\not \cong S^3$. I'm not sure whether such $N'$ exist.

share|cite|improve this answer
Ahh, so the collar neighborhood is more useful than I realized! That makes sense. So it is true that whenever the boundary is a disjoint union of spheres, then collapsing each to a point will result in a manifold? (At this point I'm not concerned with smoothness). – PrimeRibeyeDeal Jan 5 '13 at 20:52
Can we also say that if the boundary is a homology sphere (or disjoint union of them), that the quotient will be a homology manifold? – PrimeRibeyeDeal Jan 5 '13 at 20:53
To your first comment -- yes, a topological manifold. The open cone over a sphere is locally homeomorphic to Euclidean space. As for your second question, I don't know what a homology manifold is. – user54535 Jan 5 '13 at 21:21
For it to be a homology manifold, I just mean it would satisfy whatever duality a manifold would satisfy. Perhaps the better definition is that the local homology of every point would be $\mathbb{Z}$ in dimension $n$ and $0$ elsewhere. – PrimeRibeyeDeal Jan 5 '13 at 21:38
Then what you say is right! – user54535 Jan 6 '13 at 1:45

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.