Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $p(X)\in\mathbb{Z}[X]$ be a monic polynomial and let $A$ be a commutative ring in which every element is a zero of $p(X)$.

Prove that all prime ideals in $A$ are maximal.

By definition, give any prime ideal $I\leq A$, we are left to prove $A/I$ is field, i.e., for any $a\not\in I$, we want to find a nonzero element $z\in A$, such that $az-1\in I$.

$p(0)=0$ implies $p(X)=X^k(X^l+a_{l-1}X^{l-1}+\cdots+a_1X+a_0)$, such that $k\geq 1, a_0\neq 0$.

If $l=1$, then $p(a)=0, p(1)=0$ implies $a^k(a+a_0)=0,1+a_0=0$, so we can take $z=1$.

If $l\geq 2$, then $p(1+az)=0,\forall z\in A$, but how to proceed?

I have tried to use $\frac{p(x)-p(y)}{x-y}$ is also a polynomial with integers also in $\mathbb{Z}$, but got stuck, any hint?

share|cite|improve this question
Hint: Finite domains are fields. – jspecter Jan 5 '13 at 13:59
@jspecter: your hint does not apply because $A$ is not supposed to be a domain. – Georges Elencwajg Jan 5 '13 at 14:15
But $A/I$ is supposed to be a domain. And in fact $A/I$ is what we want to be a field. – Hagen von Eitzen Jan 5 '13 at 14:25
@Hagen: yes, jspecter or you should post an answer along those lines. – Georges Elencwajg Jan 5 '13 at 14:58
@GeorgesElencwajg Did so and I'm surprised how little about $p$ was needed. – Hagen von Eitzen Jan 5 '13 at 15:31
up vote 1 down vote accepted

By hypothesis the unique morphism $f:\mathbb Z\to A$ makes $A$ integral over $\mathbb Z$.
Let $\ker(f)=n\mathbb Z $.
If $n\neq 0$, we have an inclusion of rings $\bar f:\mathbb Z/n\mathbb Z \hookrightarrow A$ with $A$ integral over $\mathbb Z/n\mathbb Z$, so that [Qing Liu, Prop. 2.5.10 (b)] $\dim(A)=\dim(\mathbb Z/n\mathbb Z)=0$, which means that all prime ideals in $A$ are maximal.

And the worrying case $n=0$ ? It fortunately cannot happen because it is already impossible that all elements of the subring $ f(\mathbb Z)\cong \mathbb Z$ of $A$ be roots of some non-zero polynomial in $\mathbb Z[X]$

Note carefully
It is perfectly posssible for $A$ to satisfy the hypothesis of the question and be (hugely) infinite.
For example every element of $(\mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z)^{\mathbb R}$ is a zero of $p(X)=X^2-X$

share|cite|improve this answer
thank you very much! I also doubt that $A$ might have infinite elements before, thanks for the simply counterexample. Seems always when I try to solve a problem by computation and got stuck, then I might ignore some known facts or theories, this time the dimension and the concept "integral". – ougao Jan 5 '13 at 15:18
@ Myself, hopelly I could switch to not always attack a problem by simply computation. – ougao Jan 5 '13 at 15:19

Let $I$ be a prime ideal and let $F:=A/I$. Thus $F$ is a domain and want to show that $F$ is a field. From $p\in\mathbb Z[X]$ we obtain $\overline p\in F[X]$ with $\overline p(a)=0$ for all $a\in F$. Since $p$ is monic, so is $\overline p$, especially, $\overline p\ne 0$. Let $q\in F[X]\setminus\{0\}$ be of minimal degree among all nontrivial polynomials with $q(a)=0$ for all $a\in F$. (We only need $\overline p$ for the existence of such $q$). From $q(0)=0$ we see that $q=X r $ for some $r\in F[X]\setminus\{0\}$. Since $F$ is a domain, we have $r(a)=0$ for all $a\ne 0$. By minimality of $q$, we conclude $r(0)\ne 0$, i.e. $r=Xs-c$ with $s\in F[X]$ and $c\in F\setminus\{0\}$. Thus $a\cdot s(a)=c$ for all $a\ne 0$. By substituting $ac$ for $a$, we find $ac\cdot s(ac)=c$ and hence $a\cdot s(ac)=1$ for all $a\ne 0$, i.e $F$ is indeed a field.

share|cite|improve this answer
this is exactly the type of answer I tried to find. – ougao Jan 5 '13 at 15:43
Dear Hagen, couldn't you more simply argue that the domain $F$ is finite because its elements are roots of the non-zero polynomial $\bar p\in F[X]$ ? Then the finite domain $F$ must necessarily be a field, as remarked by jspecter? – Georges Elencwajg Jan 5 '13 at 15:54
Erm, yes you are right of course, why didn't I? As an attempt of apology for not dseeing it: A proof of "every finite domain is a field" typically uses the pigeon-hole principle and is non-constructive, while I seem to have constructed an inverse for each $a$. At least once one has determined $q$. :) – Hagen von Eitzen Jan 5 '13 at 19:39

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.