Hi: I'm reading a proof in a convex optimization book and I don't understand something. The author states the following:
Let $Q$ be a subset of $R^{n}$. We denote by $C_{L}^{k,p}(Q)$, the class of functions with the following properties:
A) any $f \in C_{L}^{k,p}(Q)$ is $k$ times differentiable on $Q$.
B) Its $p$-th derivative is Lipschitz continuous on $Q$ with the constant $L$.
i.e: $\|f^{p}(x) - f^{p}(y)\| \le L\|x - y\|$.
This is fine. But then later, inside the proof, he states the following:
if $f \in C_{L}^{2,1}(R^{n})$, then for any $s \in R^{n}$ and $\alpha > 0$, we have
$$\left\|\left(\int_{0}^{\alpha}f''(x + \tau ~ s)d ~ \tau\right) s\right\| = \|f^{\prime}(x + \alpha s) - f^{\prime}(x) \| \le \alpha L \|s\|\;.$$
I don't understand how this is implied by the definition of Lipschitz continuity defined previously. Thanks a lot.