Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

There is a well-known theorem that states that if $A$ is a finitely generated $K$-algebra, an integral domain and algebraic over $K$, then $A$ is a field. Is the integral domain condition necesary? I mean, is there an example of an algebraic algebra over $K$, such that is not a field? It may be kind of simple, but I'm a bit confused. Thank you.

share|improve this question
2  
I suppose that $K$ is a field: please add that in an edit. The integral domain condition is necessary but the condition that $A$ be finitely generated over $K$ is not necessary. –  Georges Elencwajg Jan 5 '13 at 9:28

5 Answers 5

up vote 9 down vote accepted

Sure. Consider $A=\mathbb R[x]/(x^2)$, which is generated by $\{1,x\}$ over $\mathbb R$ and is algebraic over $\mathbb R$ since $x^2=0$, yet is clearly not an integral domain hence not a field.

share|improve this answer
1  
+1, beat me by a few seconds :) –  Zev Chonoles Jan 5 '13 at 5:25
    
+1, yours is more general. Funny how often people here come up with the same counterexamples. Is it because they're natural, or because we've all been taught the same way? –  Alex Becker Jan 5 '13 at 5:27
    
Well, perhaps not natural in the strongest meaning of the word, but I feel that this is a minimal example in a certain sense. –  Zev Chonoles Jan 5 '13 at 5:34

Another example is given by $K\times K$ (the product ring, thought of as a $K$-algebra via the diagonal embedding of $K$). Any degree two example is either of this form, or of the form $K[x]/(x^2)$ considered in the other answers.

share|improve this answer
1  
@BenjaLim: Dear Benjamin, It's finite-dimensional, hence algebraic, over $\mathbb R$. (If you go through the proof that finite-dimensional implies algebraic, you can determine the actual minimal polynomials of the elements.) Regards, –  Matt E Jan 5 '13 at 6:27

For any field $K$, the algebra $A=K[x]/(x^2)$ is a finitely-generated $K$-algebra which is algebraic over $K$, but which is not an integral domain and certainly is not a field.

share|improve this answer

Here is a large class of examples coming from a structure theorem. Suppose we restrict our attention to finite-dimensional commutative algebras over a field $k$ (these are automatically both finitely generated and algebraic). Such algebras are Artinian, and a structure theorem asserts that all Artinian rings are finite direct products of Artinian local rings. Examples which are finite-dimensional commutative over $k$ include finite direct products of the rings of the form $k[x]/x^n$, or more generally $K[x]/x^n$ where $K$ is a finite extension of $k$.

share|improve this answer

After all these answers, this is not much more than a comment really. Being finitely generated by algebraic elements over $K$ implies (and is equivalent to) being finite dimensional as a vector space over $K$. And a commutative $K$ algebra that is finite dimesional is a field if and only if it is an integral domain, much in the same way as a finite commutative ring is a field if and only if it is an integral domain. In both cases the finiteness condition ensures that for the operation of multiplication by a fixed element injectivity implies surjectivity, in other words regular elements are invertible. And as the examples show there is no way you can take injectivity for granted: rings with zero divisors are very easy to construct.

I might add that if you drop the condition "integral domain", then your $K$-algebra need not even be commutatitive, and since (in English terminology) fields are supposed to be commutatitive, the quaternions would be another counterexample to your guess.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.