Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Suppose $\kappa > \operatorname{cf}(\kappa)$. Show that:

i) if $\kappa$ strong limit then $\kappa^{<\kappa} = \kappa^{\operatorname{cf}(\kappa)}$

ii) if $\kappa$ not strong limit then $2^{<\kappa} = \kappa^{<\kappa} > \kappa$.

My thoughts:

for i), write $\kappa = \sum_{i < \operatorname{cf}(\kappa)} \kappa_i$ with $\kappa_i < \kappa$ for each i. Then, $\kappa^{<\kappa} = \sum_{\lambda < \kappa} \kappa^{\lambda} = \sum_{i<\operatorname{cf}(\kappa)}\kappa^{\kappa_i}$. Now, we know that $\kappa^{\lambda} \leq (\sum_{\alpha < \kappa} \alpha^{\lambda})^{\operatorname{cf}(\kappa)}$, so $\sum_{i<\operatorname{cf}(\kappa)}\kappa^{\kappa_i} \leq \sum_{i<\operatorname{cf}(\kappa)}(\sum_{\alpha < \kappa} \alpha^{\kappa_i})^{\operatorname{cf}(\kappa)}$, but I'm not sure what to do now.

for ii) I guess an argument similar to the above shows that $\kappa^{<\kappa}= \kappa^{\operatorname{cf}(\kappa)} > \kappa$, but I'm stuck on showing $2^{<\kappa} = \kappa^{<\kappa}$. How does merely knowing the fact that for some $\mu < \kappa$ $2^{\mu} \geq \kappa$ let us deduce the equivalence?

share|improve this question
    
For (ii), if $\lambda>\mu$, then $2^\lambda=(2^\mu)^\lambda\geq\kappa^\lambda$, so $2^{<\kappa}\geq\kappa^{<\kappa}$. –  Miha Habič Jan 4 '13 at 19:19

2 Answers 2

up vote 3 down vote accepted

For (i), notice that you have $\alpha^{\kappa_i}<\kappa$ in the notation of your last inequality. This is because $\kappa$ is a strong limit, so $\alpha^{\kappa_i}\leq (2^\alpha)^{\kappa_i}<\kappa$. But then, following your inequality, $$\kappa^\lambda\leq \sum_{i<\mathrm{cf}(\kappa)}\left(\sum_{\alpha<\kappa}\alpha^{\kappa_i}\right)^{\mathrm{cf}(\kappa)} \leq \sum_{i<\mathrm{cf}(\kappa)}\kappa^{\mathrm{cf}(\kappa)} = \kappa^{\mathrm{cf}(\kappa)}$$ Sending $\lambda$ to $\kappa$ we get $\kappa^{<\kappa}\leq \kappa^{\mathrm{cf}(\kappa)}$ and the reverse inequality is obvious.

For (ii), Brian and I have already argued why $2^{<\kappa}=\kappa^{<\kappa}$. Of course, since $\kappa$ is assumed to not be a strong limit, $2^{<\kappa}>\kappa$ must clearly hold.

share|improve this answer
    
You beat me to it. :-) –  Brian M. Scott Jan 4 '13 at 20:01
    
@BrianM.Scott It's good to flex the old cardinal arithmetic muscle now and again. –  Miha Habič Jan 4 '13 at 20:05
    
@MihaHabič: Sorry, I might be being obtuse, but I don't see how we have $\alpha^{\kappa_i} < \kappa$. Your argument seems to only work if we already assume that $\alpha^{\kappa_i} < \kappa$, as strong limit only says that if $\lambda < \kappa$ then $2^{\lambda} < \kappa$, so $\alpha^{\kappa_i} < 2^{\alpha^{\kappa_i}}$, but we can't conclude $2^{\alpha^{\kappa_i}} < \kappa$ immediately –  Kris Jan 4 '13 at 20:27
    
@Kris The estimate is $\alpha^{\kappa_i}\leq (2^{\alpha})^{\kappa_i}<\kappa$, using the fact that $\kappa$ is a strong limit in the second step. There is just the one layer of exponents, not two as in your comment. –  Miha Habič Jan 4 '13 at 21:06
    
@MihaHabič: oh, I see, sorry, I misread your comment. Thanks! –  Kris Jan 4 '13 at 21:48

(ii) If $\kappa$ is not a strong limit, then $\kappa\le 2^\lambda$ for some $\lambda<\kappa$. Thus, if $\lambda\le\mu<\kappa$, then

$$2^\mu=\left(2^\lambda\right)^\mu\ge\kappa^\mu\ge 2^\mu\;,$$

and it follows that $2^{<\kappa}=\kappa^{<\kappa}$.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.