# Prove that if $\sigma(n)=2n+1$ then $n$ is an odd perfect square.

Prove that if $\sigma(n)=2n+1$ then $n$ is an odd perfect square.

(Here, $\sigma(n)$ is the sum of the positive divisors of $n$ including 1 and $n$ itself.)

As I know, this $n$ is a quasiperfect number, and I just proved that $n$ is a perfect square or $\frac{n}{2}$ is a perfect square.

-

I had seen this result before, but not the proof, so I looked up Cattaneo's original argument. It's in Italian. What follows is his proof with some details filled in.

First, if $\sigma(n) = 2n+1$ then $\sigma(n)$ is odd.

If $n = \prod_{i=1}^r p_i^{a_i}$ is the prime factorization of $n$, then we know that $$\sigma(n) = \prod_{i=1}^r (1 + p_i + p_i^2 + \cdots + p_i^{a_i}).$$ Since $\sigma(n)$ is odd, though, each factor $1 + p_i + p_i^2 + \cdots + p_i^{a_i}$ must also be odd.

For each odd prime factor $p_i$, then, there must be an odd number of terms in the sum $1 + p_i + p_i^2 + \cdots + p_i^{a_i}$. Thus $a_i$ must be even. This means that if $p_i$ is odd, $p_i^{a_i}$ is an odd perfect square. The product of odd perfect squares is another odd perfect square, and therefore $n = 2^s m^2$, where $m$ is odd.

Now we have $\sigma(n) = (2^{s+1}-1)M$, where $M = \prod_{p_i \text{ odd}} (1 + p_i + p_i^2 + \cdots + p_i^{a_i})$. Since $\sigma(n) = 2n+1$, \begin{align*} &(2^{s+1}-1)M = 2^{s+1}m^2 + 1 \\ \implies &(2^{s+1}-1)(M - m^2)-1 = m^2. \end{align*} This means that $-1$ is a quadratic residue for each prime factor of $2^{s+1}-1$. A consequence of the quadratic reciprocity theorem, though, is that $-1$ is a quadratic residue of an odd prime $p$ if and only if $p \equiv 1 \bmod 4$. Thus all prime factors of $2^{s+1}-1$ are congruent to $1 \bmod 4$. The product of numbers congruent to $1 \bmod 4$ is still congruent to $1 \bmod 4$, so $2^{s+1}-1 \equiv 1 \bmod 4$. However, if $s > 0$, then $2^{s+1}-1 \equiv 3 \bmod 4$. Thus $s$ must be $0$. Therefore, $n = m^2$, where $m$ is odd.

-
This strikes me as a rather challenging homework problem. – Mike Spivey Jan 6 '13 at 3:52
Maybe so, but, as it is a homework problem, is it a good idea to give so detailed a response? – Gerry Myerson Jan 6 '13 at 4:10
@Gerry: A fair question - and one that has been debated extensively on meta, as I'm sure you are aware. – Mike Spivey Jan 6 '13 at 6:17