Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm trying to show that $x^2+3x-1$ is irreducible in $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{13}]$. I have that the roots are $\frac{-3+\sqrt{13}}{2}$ and $\frac{-3-\sqrt{13}}{2}$, but I don't believe this is enough to show irreducibility. What else would I need?

share|cite|improve this question
Usually, we write $\mathbb Z[\sqrt{13}]$, with round brackets indicating rational functions of $\sqrt{13}$ – Thomas Andrews Jan 3 '13 at 19:34
Yes, please fix the notation as indicated. $\mathbb Z(\sqrt{13})$ has no standard meaning in this context. – PatrickR Jan 4 '13 at 0:14
up vote 5 down vote accepted

In fact, since $x^2+3x-1$ is a (monic) quadratic polynomial, it is enough; the only way it could factor is into linear factors, which would require that its roots lie in the given ring.

Note that this is not true for quartics and higher: for example, $x^4+4=(x^2+2x+2)(x^2–2x+2)$ factors over $\mathbb{Z}$ even though its roots certainly are not integers.

share|cite|improve this answer
What about $6x^2-4x-3=(2x+1)(3x-2)$? It is reducible in $\mathbb{Z}[x]$, but has no roots in $\mathbb{Z}$. – Frank White Jan 3 '13 at 20:02
You also need the condition of monic. – dinoboy Jan 3 '13 at 20:07
@Frank: Sorry, I should have said monic, which avoids that problem. – Zev Chonoles Jan 3 '13 at 20:08

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.