Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Pick out the sequences $\{f_n\}$ which are uniformly convergent.

(a) $f_n(x)$=$\sin^n x$ on [$0,\pi/2$)
(b) $f_n(x)$=$\dfrac{x^n}{n}+1$ on [$0,1$)

I am totally stuck on this problem. How can I able to solve this problem. Can anybody help me please

share|cite|improve this question
First figure out what they converge to pointwise. Then use that as a candidate to see if you can pick your $\delta$ independent of $x$. Likely, both will break near the right hand side of the domain. – toypajme Jan 2 '13 at 16:44
Here is a related problem. – Mhenni Benghorbal Jan 2 '13 at 18:26

a) $\lim_{n\to \infty}f_n(x)=0$ for $0\leq x<\frac{\pi}{2}\implies f_n\to f=0.$Now, $\operatorname{Sup}_{x\in[0,\frac{\pi}{2})}|f_n(x)-f(x)|=\operatorname{Sup}_{x\in[0,\frac{\pi}{2})}|\sin^nx|=1\to 1\neq0\implies \{f_n\}$ is not uniformly convergent to $1$ on $[0,\frac{\pi}{2}).$

b) $x=0\implies \lim_{n\to \infty}f_n(x)=1$ & $0<x<1\implies\lim_{n\to \infty}f_n(x)=\lim_{n\to \infty}[\frac{x^n}{n}+1]=1.$ So, $f_n\to f=1.$ Now, $\operatorname{Sup}_{x\in[0,1)}|f_n(x)-f(x)|=\operatorname{Sup}_{x\in[0,1)}|\frac{x^n}{n}|=\frac{1}{n}\to0\implies\{f_n\}$ is uniformly convergent to $1$ on $[0,1).$

share|cite|improve this answer

For (b) prove $f_n\to f$ pointwise where $f(x)=1$, $x\in [0,1)$. Observe: $$\left\|f_n-f\right\|=\sup_{x\in [0,1)}\left|\frac{x^n}{n}+1-1\right|=\sup_{x\in [0,1)}\frac{x^n}{n}= \frac{1}{n}$$ What does this tell you?

(a) can be treated similarly by noticing $\sin (x)<1$ in that domain

EDIT: For (a) the limit is $f(x)=0$. $$\left\|f_n-f\right\|=\sup_{x\in [0,\frac{\pi}2)}\left|\sin^nx\right|=\sup_{x\in [0, \frac{\pi}2)}\sin^n x=1$$

share|cite|improve this answer
then both the option are I correct? – ramu Jan 2 '13 at 17:03
The sequence in a) does not converge uniformly on $[0,\pi/2)$. The sequence converges pointwise to $0$ on $[0,\pi/2)$; but for any $n$, one can find an $x_n\in[0,\pi/2)$ so that $\sin^n (x_n)>1/2$. – David Mitra Jan 2 '13 at 17:06
@DavidMitra By saying treated similarly, I didn't mean the convergence is uniform as well. I will edit my post to clarify this – Nameless Jan 2 '13 at 17:08
@ramu Look at the edited answer – Nameless Jan 2 '13 at 17:12

Recall the definition of uniform convergence: a sequence of functions $f_n$ converges uniformly to $f$ if, for every $\epsilon \gt 0$, there exists some $N(\epsilon) \in \mathbb{N}$ independent of $x$ such that $\forall n \gt N$, and $\forall x$ in the domain, $|f_n(x) - f(x)| \lt \epsilon$. Intuitively: how "far" you have to go "out" in the sequence in order to get within a given error $\epsilon$ is the same for all $x$.

So, with that in mind, here's a hint:

For (a), what happens as $x$ gets closer to $\pi/2$? Can you show that you have to take larger and larger $n$ for the sequence to get within a given $\epsilon$ of its limit function there? Remember, this is what it means to have pointwise convergence only, and for uniform convergence to fail.

You might consider the similar but perhaps easier situation: $f_n(x) = x^n$ on $[0,1)$.

For (b), do you run into the same problem?

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.