It is not hard to check that the three roots of $x^3-2=0$ is $\sqrt[3]{2}, \sqrt[3]{2}\zeta_3, \sqrt[3]{2}\zeta_3^{2}$, hence the splitting field for $x^3-2$ over $\mathbb{Q}$ is $\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt[3]{2}, \sqrt[3]{2}\zeta_3, \sqrt[3]{2}\zeta_3^{2}]$. However, since $\sqrt[3]{2}\zeta_3^{2}$ can be compute through $\sqrt[3]{2}, \sqrt[3]{2}\zeta_3$ then the splitting field is $\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt[3]{2}, \sqrt[3]{2}\zeta_3]$.
In the case $x^5-2=0$, in the book Galois theory by J.S.Milne, the author said that the splitting field is $\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt[5]{2}, \zeta_5]$.
My question is :
- How can the other roots of $x^5-2$ be represented in term of $\sqrt[5]{2}, \zeta_5$, so that he can write the splitting field is$\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt[5]{2}, \zeta_5] $ ?
- Is the splitting field for $x^n -a$ over $\mathbb{Q}$ is $\mathbb{Q}[\alpha,\zeta_n]$, where $\alpha$ is the real $n$-th root of $a$ ?
