Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $H,K$ be two subgroups of a group $G$ and let $A=H\cap K$ and $B$ be the subgroup of $G$ generated by $H$ and $K$. We know that \begin{array}{rcl} A & \rightarrow & H \\ \downarrow & & \downarrow \\ K & \rightarrow & G \end{array} is a pull-back square (morphisms are inclusions).

Does there exists a similar interpretation for $B$?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

The most blunt way of describing $\langle H \cup K \rangle \le G$ is as the image of the canonical homomorphism $H * K \to G$ (determined by the inclusions $H \hookrightarrow G, K \hookrightarrow G$), where $H * K$ denotes the coproduct (free product) of $H$ and $K$ as abstract groups.

This generalises readily to any cocomplete regular category and any small family of subobjects. (Exercise.)

share|cite|improve this answer

$H$ and $K$ are both objects in the category of subobjects of $G$. The category of subobjects is a preorder (exercise), so it behaves like a poset except that some objects are isomorphic. The categorical product in this category, which agrees with the pullback, is the intersection $H \cap K$, and the categorical coproduct in this category is the subgroup of $G$ generated by $H$ and $K$.

The nLab asserts that in a topos, the coproduct of subobjects is their pushout along their product, but this is false for groups.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.