Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

It is well known that for any sequence $\{x_n\}$ of real or complex numbers which converges to a limit $x$, the sequence of averages of the first $n$ terms is also convergent to $x$. That is, the sequence $\{a_n\}$ defined by

$$a_n = \frac{x_1+x_2+\ldots + x_n}{n}$$

converges to $x$. How "severe" of a weighting function $w(n)$ can we create that the sequence of weighted averages $\{b_n\}$ defined by

$$b_n = \frac{w(1)x_1 + w(2)x_2 + \ldots + w(n)x_n}{w(1)+w(2)+\ldots+w(n)} $$

is convergent to $x$? Is it possible to choose $w(n)$ such that $\{b_n\}$ is divergent?

share|improve this question
I think you might want to ensure that $w(n)>0$ –  Amr Dec 30 '12 at 15:21
Sure, it makes sense to take non-negative $w(n)$. The case $w(1) = 1$ and $w(n) = 0$ for $n>1$ is a provocative counterexample, so I don't necessarily want to exclude it. –  orlandpm Dec 30 '12 at 15:25
The answer surely depends on the sequence $(x_n)$. If, for example $x_n\equiv 1$, then $b_n$ will converge to one for any weighting sequence $(w(n))$. –  Eckhard Dec 30 '12 at 15:48
The crucial condition on $w$ is $\sum_n w(n)=\infty$. If it holds, then any tail of the sequence $w(n)$ dominates the head, and therefore the influence of the initial terms of the sequence $x_n$ becomes negligible in the long run. If it fails, then the opposite happens and you can find a convergent sequence $x_n$ for which the weighted averages have a different limit (but they will still have a limit). –  user53153 Dec 30 '12 at 20:01

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Weighted averages belong to the class of matrix summation methods.



Represent the sequence $\{x_n\}$ by the infinite vector $X:=\left(\begin{matrix}x_1\\x_2\\\vdots\end{matrix}\right)$, and $\{b_n\}$ by the vector $B:=\left(\begin{matrix}b_1\\b_2\\\vdots\end{matrix}\right)$. Then we have $$B=WX.$$

In our case $W_{i,j}:=\frac{w(j)}{w(1)+\ldots+w(i)}$, for $j\leq i$, and $W_{i,j}:=0$, for $j>i$.

The summation method is called regular if it transforms convergent sequences into convergent sequences with the same limit. For matrix summation methods we have Silverman-Toeplitz theorem, that says that a matrix summation method is regular if and only if the following are satisfied:

  1. $\lim_{i\rightarrow\infty} W_{i,j}=0$, for every $j\in\mathbb{N}$ (entries converge to zero along columns)

  2. $\lim_{i\rightarrow\infty}\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}W_{i,j}=1$ (rows add up to $1$)

  3. $\sup_{i}\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}|W_{i,j}|<\infty$ (the sums of the absolute values on the rows are bounded.)

In your case $2$ and $3$ are satisfied (if you assume, as in the comment that $w(i)\geq0$), therefore you get the result if and only if

$$\sum w(i)=\infty.$$

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.