Sign up ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

While I was studying my maths book, I came across this equation:

$$ xe^{-x}+2e^{-x}=0 $$

I tried to solve it in different ways, but each time I break up some rule. My best try was this:

Let's $u=e^{-x}$, thus we have: $$ xu+2u=0 $$ By taking $u$ as a common factor we get:

$$ u(x+2)=0 $$

By dividing both side by $(x+2)$ we get:

$$ u=0 $$

But $u=e^{-x}$, then:

$$ e^{-x}=0 \\ ln(e^{-x}) = ln(0) ?? $$

$ln(0)$ is obviously wrong, where did I slip?

share|cite|improve this question

3 Answers 3

up vote 11 down vote accepted

When you divide by $x+2$ how do you know $x+2\neq 0$? Indeed you don't! Thats why you should get $u=0$ or $x+2=0$. The first equation has no solutions as $u=e^{-x}>0$. The second gives $x=-2$.

You write $e^{-x}=0$. This equation has no solutions. But you can't write $\ln (e^{-x})=\ln (0)$!!!! This is because $\ln (0)$ is not defined!

share|cite|improve this answer
@Sp. Note that as above never,never make some exponential terms like $e^a$ equal to $0$. It is absolutely wrong. No additional notes needed for your problem +1 :-) – Babak S. Dec 30 '12 at 9:46
$\ln(0!!!!)$ is defined; it's zero. :-) – Henning Makholm Dec 30 '12 at 10:45
@HenningMakholm I believe you know I meant $\ln(0)$ and not $\ln(0!!!)$! – Nameless Dec 30 '12 at 10:48

If $xe^{-x}+2e^{-x}=0$, then divide across by $e^{-x}$ (which is non-zero) to get $x+2=0$, which has the solution $x=-2$.

share|cite|improve this answer

$a\cdot b=0\implies a=0\text{ or }b=0$ so $u=0\text{ or }x+2=0$.

You deduced $u\neq0$ hence $x+2=0$. That is $x=-2$

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.