Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

If $\sum a_k$ converges absolutely, then $|a_k|<\frac{1}{k}$ for all sufficiently large k.

I'm trying to give a proof or a counterexample about the above statement, but I'm not really sure where to start. I think it's false, but don't know how to go about finding a counterexample. Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks

share|improve this question
    
Do you mean $|a_k| < \frac {1}{k}$? –  Calvin Lin Dec 30 '12 at 0:10
    
Yep I did, thanks –  user51327 Dec 30 '12 at 1:10

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

HINT: The idea is to have infinitely many terms $a_k$ such that $a_k\ge\frac1k$, but to spread them out very thinly. Try letting

$$a_k=\begin{cases} \frac1k,&\text{if }k\text{ is a perfect square}\\\\ 0,&\text{otherwise}\;. \end{cases}$$

share|improve this answer
1  
@Jonas: It means that I didn’t include a proof that the example works. I should perhaps have said BIG HINT. –  Brian M. Scott Dec 30 '12 at 0:03
    
I still don't understand how you came up with the example? And why do you want to spread them out thinly? –  user51327 Dec 30 '12 at 1:10
    
@user51897 The intuition is that $\int \frac {1}{k} dk = \ln k$, so when evaluated from $n=k$ to infinity, has the value $\infty$. This means that the terms need not converge. As such, we need it to be less frequent than that. Brian's intuition is that $\int \frac {1}{k^2} dk = \frac {1}{k}$, which when evaluated as a definite integral, is finite. –  Calvin Lin Dec 30 '12 at 1:16
    
@user51897: Because the harmonic series diverges, so you can't have "too many" terms such that $a_k\geq \frac{1}{k}$. If you are going to have infinitely many terms such that $a_k\geq \frac1{k}$, they have to be chosen carefully from a set such that those reciprocals do converge. The sum of the reciprocals of the squares converges. Another example would be the sum of the reciprocals of the powers of $2$. –  Jonas Meyer Dec 30 '12 at 1:17
    
Ok, so I think I finally understand that. How do you start a proof about an absolutely convergent series? –  user51327 Dec 30 '12 at 16:54

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.