Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I think I see $ S_4/V_4 \cong S_3 $ from the first table beneath marked in the green. I just ignore $ V_4 $ and think of it as mapped away by the bijection $ f^{-1} $ where $ f(s) = s V_4 \iff f^{-1}(\sigma V_4) = s \in S_3 $ But why do they compute only $\{S_3\}V_4 $? By definition, $ S_4/V_4 = \{sV_4 : s \in S_4\} $. Where are the rest of the elements in $ S_4/V_4 $ like $(2, 1, 3, 4)V_4, (2, 1, 4, 3)V_4, (2, 3, 1, 4)V_4 $ etc...?

I don't see "The rows are the cosets of $V_4 $ in $S_4$." Can someone show me this please? For instance, the third row of the table marked in the blue consists of $(1, 4, 3, 2), (1, 3, 2, 4) \notin V_4 $.

I can't see $ S_4/V_4 \cong S_3 $ from the second table. Can someone explain it please? Thank you.

example

share|improve this question
1  
What is $Z_4$ ? –  Amr Dec 29 '12 at 23:37
    
Why do you say that $(1, 4, 3, 2) \not \in S_4$? It is the permutation on 4 elements that sends 1 to 4, 4 to 3, 3 to 2 and 2 to 1. –  Calvin Lin Dec 29 '12 at 23:43
    
@Amr I believe that means $V_4$, and it's a typo. –  Calvin Lin Dec 29 '12 at 23:43
    
@Calvin Lin . OK this makes sense –  Amr Dec 29 '12 at 23:46

3 Answers 3

I'm guessing that by $\,Z_4\,$ you actually mean the Klein viergrupp

$$C_2\times C_2\cong \{(1)\,,\,(12)(34)\,,\,(13)(24)\,,\,(14)(23)\}$$

since the above one is the only normal subgroup of order $\,4\,$ of $\,S_4\,$ , but then, since the cyclic group of order $\,6\,$ is obviously abelian ,we get

$$S_4/Z_4\cong C_6\Longleftrightarrow S_4^{'}\leq Z_4$$

and this is false since $\,(123)\notin Z_4\,$ , but $\,(123)\in A_4=S_4^{'}\,$.

Thus, as the only other group of order $\,6\,$, up to isomorphism, is $\,S_3\,$ ,we get that $\,S_4/Z_4\cong S_3\,$

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you for your answer, sir. You wrote that since the cyclic group of order six is Abelian, the factor of $S_4$ by the Klein viergrupp is isomorphic to the said cyclic group exactly when the alternative group $S_{4}^{'}$ is a subgroup of the Klein group. Why is that? Are you referring to a more general statement? –  Student Jun 21 at 17:03

A coset of $V_4$ is a set $gV_4=\{gv:v\in V_4\}$. So in fact any coset of $V_4$ formed by a $g\in G$ which is not in $V_4$ will contain no elements of $V_4$. (This is easy to prove; try it.)

DonAntonio has shown you a somewhat advanced way to see how $S_3\cong S_4/V_4$, but considering your questions for us, I think that the best way to see it, at this point, would be to write out the actual isomorphism $\mu:S_4/V_4\rightarrow S_3$. Use the cosets they've given you. Ensure you know how coset multiplication works - $(gV_4)(hV_4)=(gh)V_4$. You might have to go back and review some definitions.

share|improve this answer

Where are the rest of the elements of $S_4/V_4$? Try computing one of them. You'll see that it's equal to one of the cosets already listed in the green section. (Remember that the order of elements in a set doesn't matter, and also that re-cycling the elements in a cycle also doesn't change it: (1,2,4,3) = (2,4,3,1) = (4,3,1,2) = (3,1,2,4)).

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.