Tell me more ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm having difficulty proving a well-known result from functional analysis. Any hints would be greatly appreciated.

Fix a Fréchet differentiable map of Banach spaces $g: X \to B$. Assume that, at a point $x_0 \in X$ where $g(x_0) = 0$, the derivative $Dg$ is Fredholm and surjective, so in particular the index of $Dg$ is the dimension of its kernel. A typical place this might arise is in solving PDEs, where $g$ is given by some nice differential operator and $x_0$ is some generic solution to the PDE.

I want to prove:

The moduli space $\{x \in X \, | \, g(x) = 0\}$ has a smooth chart near $x_0$ of dimension $index(Dg)$.

I know this is supposed to be a consequence of the implicit function theorem for Frechet maps, which I understand. I also understand the proof of the submersion theorem for finite-dimensional manifolds, which is simply an application of the implicit function theorem in finite dimensions. I am trying, in essence, to prove the above result the same way one would prove the finite-dimensional submersion theorem.

However, I'm having difficulty proving a version of the submersion theorem in the infinite-dimensional setting. I'll describe my approach here -- I suspect that maybe I'm trying to use the implicit function theorem in the wrong way.

Defining the finite-dimensional vector space $Y = kernel(Dg)$ and the Banach space $Z = B \times Y$, if one can choose a splitting map $\pi: X \to Y$, one can define a map $$F: X \times Y \to Z$$ given by $$F(x,y) = (g(x), \pi(x) - y).$$ Then the implicit function theorem obviously gives a parametrization of the set $\{x \, | \, g(x) = 0\}$ near $x_0$, in terms of an open set in $Y$.

The splitting map $\pi$ always exists when $X, B$ are finite dimensional, but my question is: can such a splitting always be chosen when $X, B$ are infinite-dimensional? And if not, how can I prove the main result above? I'm trying to follow the finite-dimensional analogies, perhaps too naively, and failing. Any help would be appreciated.

share|improve this question
1  
If I understand correctly, you are asking why $Y$ is complemented in $X$. Every finite-dimensional subspace is complemented. Just write the identity map on $Y$ as a sum of rank-1 linear maps (essentially linear functionals) and extend them via Hahn-Banach. – user53153 Dec 28 '12 at 19:23
Perfect! Thank you very much. – User 24601 Dec 29 '12 at 0:47
Glad to help. I'll copy the comment into the answer box, so that the question does not look unanswered. – user53153 Dec 29 '12 at 0:49

1 Answer

up vote 2 down vote accepted

You are asking why $Y$ is complemented in $X$. Every finite-dimensional subspace is complemented. Just write the identity map on $Y$ as a sum of rank-$1$ linear maps (essentially linear functionals) and extend them via the Hahn-Banach theorem.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.