Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am not sure about the answer to this question. For a Brownian motion $B_t$ and a process $M$ defined by $M_t=B_{t-s}$ if $t>s$ and 0 else, what is the Quadratic Covariation $[B,M]_t$ ?

I find $(t-s)$ if $t>s$ and $0$ else, but the right answer shall be 0 and I can't figure out where I missed something.

Best regards

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Well, we'd like to show that the following limit

$$\lim_{n\to\infty} \sum_{k=0}^{\lfloor 2^n t \rfloor}(M_{(k+1)2^{-n}}-M_{k2^{-n}})(B_{(k+1)2^{-n}}-B_{k2^{-n}})$$ exists a.s., since this would then equal $[B, M]_t$. Rewrite the limit as $$ \lim_{n\to\infty} \sum_{k=\lceil 2^ns\rceil}^{\lfloor 2^n t \rfloor}(B_{(k+1)2^{-n}-s}-B_{k2^{-n}-s})(B_{(k+1)2^{-n}}-B_{k2^{-n}})\\ $$

and see that it's the limit of random variables $X_n$, with $\mathbb{E}(X_n) = 0$ and $\text{Var}(X_n)\to 0$. (Then show convergence in the usual way, with the first Borel-Cantelli lemma.)

When I first tried this question, I didn't do this - I tried to show that $MB$ was a continuous local martingale. The trouble with this - as far as I can see - is that you have to find a filtration with respect to which both $M$ and $B$ are semimartingales. $M$ doesn't seem to be a semimartingale w.r.t. the natural filtration of $B$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.