Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Suppose $g(z)$ has an isolated singularity at $z=z_0$ and $|\Re[g(z)]| \ge M>0$ for all $z \in \mathbb C-\{z_0\}$. What is the type of singularity of $g$ at $z_0$?

I have a guess it is removable but I could not argue why it can not be a pole though. To rule out essential, I argue with Casorati-Weierstrass theorem.

share|cite|improve this question
How do you define $\text{Reg} z$, and what is $M$? – Fly by Night Dec 28 '12 at 0:26
That's the real part of $g$ and it takes the value outside the strip of $-M$ to $M$ – Deepak Dec 28 '12 at 0:29
I've edited the LaTeX. Now, what is the question? You have given an assumption, but what would you like us to do with that assumption? – Fly by Night Dec 28 '12 at 0:45
@FlybyNight, I am sorry, I need to figure out what kind of singularity does $g$ have at $z_0$? – Deepak Dec 28 '12 at 0:46

As a counter example, consider the following function:

$$g(z) = \frac{z^2}{z(z-1)} \, . $$

This function has a removable singularity at $z=0$. Consider the domain $\mathbb{C}\backslash\{0\}$. You claim that there exists an $M>0$ such that $|\Re[g(z)]| \ge M > 0$ for all $z \in \mathbb{C}\backslash\{0\}$. However, this is not true.

We see that, assuming $z \neq 1$, $\Re[g(z)] = 0 \iff x^2-x+y^2=0 \iff |z-1/2|=1/2$. So there is no $M > 0$ for which $\Re[g(z)] \ge M > 0$ for all $z \in \mathbb{C}\backslash\{0\}$.

share|cite|improve this answer
I just realized that if we consider function $\frac {1}{g(z)}$, then that function will be analytic using Riemann Theorem on removable singularity, and is entire of course. Then Liouville's applied to $\frac{1}{g(z)}$ going to tell you the function is constant and hence $g(z)$ is a constant function. That means the singularity is removable. I don't know if I am right on this? You example rocks, I can not see a point to doubt on that. It seems the way I did also make sense. Would you plase comment further? – Deepak Jan 8 '13 at 17:30

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.