Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I saw a question on internet, tried to solve but I can't:

\begin{equation} 3^x\cdot x^3 = 1 \end{equation}

I get $\ln$ function and made some equalization and I reached that:

\begin{equation} -x\cdot\ln(3) = 3\cdot\ln(x) \end{equation}

I could not continue after that. How does it solve?

Wolfram|Alpha says nearly $x\approx 0.757$.

I searched on Google and on that site but I could not found anything (I guess about the mathematical sign).

share|cite|improve this question
Wow. So many people worked on improving this post. Can we please just stop for two minutes? – Asaf Karagila Dec 27 '12 at 18:46
@Amzotti: in $LaTeX$ the common functions get a backslash so they are not italicized. So $\ln$ comes from \ln. Also there is \approx for $\approx$ – Ross Millikan Dec 27 '12 at 18:47
up vote 12 down vote accepted

Equations like this can be solved in terms of the Lambert W function, which is the inverse of $f(z)=ze^z$ (and generally they don't have closed-form solutions in more elementary functions). Specifically, consider the equation $y \ln y = e^{\ln y}\ln y = k$. This inverts to $\ln y=W(k),$ or $y=e^{W(k)}$. In your case, you have $$ \frac{\ln 3}{3}=-\frac{1}{x}\ln x=\frac{1}{x}\ln\frac{1}{x}, $$ implying that $$ \frac{1}{x}=\exp\left[W\left(\frac{\ln 3}{3}\right)\right]=e^{W(\ln \sqrt[3]{3})}, $$ or $$ x=e^{-W(\ln \sqrt[3]{3})}. $$ This correctly evaluates to $0.7576969788...$

share|cite|improve this answer
There are actually three principal solutions. The cube root of $3$ has one real solution and two complex solutions. – Fly by Night Dec 28 '12 at 0:58
@FlybyNight: Not sure what you mean by "principal" solutions. The function $3^x x^3 = e^{x\ln 3} x^3$ is single-valued. Because $W$ is multi-valued, there are actually infinitely many solutions (e.g., $-7.0814 + 11.3443 i$); arguably the only special one is the real one. – mjqxxxx Dec 28 '12 at 3:37

I don't believe the equation $$-x\ln 3=3\ln x\iff 3\ln x+x\ln 3=0$$ can be solved by radicals, the solution probably no closed form . You can do the following however:

The function $$f(x)=3\ln x+x\ln 3$$ is strictly increasing and so it has at most one root. In addition, $f(\frac13)=-3\ln 3+\frac13\ln 3<0$ while $f(3)=6\ln 3>0$ and because $f$ is continuous, $f$ has a root in $(\frac13,3)$ (Intermediate Value Theorem). Therefore, there is only one solution of your equation and is in $(\frac13,3)$

share|cite|improve this answer

Try Newton's method on $f(x) = x^3 3^x - 1$. Begin with a guess of $x_0=1$:

$$x_{n+1} = x_n - \frac{f(x_n)}{f'(x_n)}$$

where $f'(x) = x^2 3^x (3 + x \log{3})$

As an example, $x_1 = 1 - \frac{3-1}{3 (3 + \log{3})} \approx 0.837343$

Repeat until you get the desired number of significant figures.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.