Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $X$ be a scheme, $Y$ a proper $X$-scheme and $Z$ a separated $X$-scheme. Let $f : Y \to Z$ be a morphism of $X$-schemes. I would like to prove that the image of $f$ is closed in $Z$.

Here is what I have so far. The morphism $Y \times_X Z \to Z$ is is a closed (topological) map, as $Y$ is proper over $X$. The morphism $f$ can be factored as $Y \to Y \times_X Z \to Z$, where the first morphism $i$ is given by $(\mathrm{id}_Y, f)$. Since the second map is closed, all I need to prove is that the first map has a closed image. This is where I'm stuck: I don't see where the separatedness of $Z$ can be involved, or how to prove the claim at all.

Am I headed in the right direction? How can I end the proof?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 10 down vote accepted

Your argument is correct, and you're almost done. The morphism $(\mathrm{id}_Y,f):Y\rightarrow Y\times_XZ$ is called the graph of $f$, sometimes denoted $\Gamma_f$. The fact you need is that, for $Z\rightarrow X$ separated, the graph of any $X$-morphism $Y\rightarrow Z$ is a closed immersion. I don't know how to do diagrams on MSE, but the point is that the graph is the base change of the diagonal $Z\rightarrow Z\times_XZ$ along $f\times\mathrm{id}_Z:Y\times_XZ\rightarrow Z\times_XZ$. Since $Z$ is separated over $X$, its diagonal is a closed immersion, so the graph is as well, being a base change of a closed immersion.

Details (and the relevant cartesian diagram) can be found in the first few pages of Chapter 9 of Goertz-Wedhorn. They can also be found in the section Separation Axioms of the Stacks Project chapter titled Schemes (currently section 21 of chapter 21, with permanent tag 01KH).

This type of argument is used a lot. I think Ravi Vakil (in his notes) calls it the cancelation principle (something like that). A precise statement is: let $P$ be a property of morphisms which is stable under composition and base change and such that closed immersions have $P$. Then for morphisms $f:Y\rightarrow Z$ and $g:Z\rightarrow X$, if $g\circ f$ has $P$ and $g$ is separated, then $f$ has $P$. The proof is just as you've outlined. You factor $f$ into its graph followed by the projection $Y\times_XZ\rightarrow Z$. The projection is a base change of $g\circ f:Y\rightarrow X$, so it has property $P$ since $g\circ f$ does, and the graph is a closed immersion because $g$ is separated, so it too has property $P$. Thus $f$ has property $P$, being a composite of morphisms with property $P$.

What you're proving is the particular case where $P$ is the property of being proper. Another would be where $P$ is the property of being finite. There is also another version of the cancelation principle where closed immersions are replaced by quasi-compact immersions and separatedness by quasi-separatedness, but the argument is exactly the same.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.