Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What does this notation

$||\nabla u|| _p$ mean? I would like an exact definition.

Also I have seen $|\nabla u|_1$. Does this mean the $\sum_i|\partial_i u|$?

share|improve this question
    
Maybe I should make it clear the latter means a Euclidean norm of some sort and the former is an L^p norm. I haven't figured it out. As it stands, it might mean $||\sum_i |D_i u| ||_p$, but I do not know. –  Lost1 Dec 27 '12 at 19:52
add comment

2 Answers 2

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Usually $$\lVert \nabla u \rVert_p^p = \sum_{i=1}^n\lVert D_iu \rVert_p^p$$ where $D_i$ means the $i$th partial derivative. The $\lVert \cdot \rVert_p$ refers to the $L^p$ norm, i.e., $\lVert u \rVert_p = (\int |u|^p)^{\frac{1}{p}}.$

For your second question: set $p =1$, so we have the $L^1$ norm.

share|improve this answer
    
Do you mean p rather than 2? the | | means Euclidean norm, I think. From the context, I am reading from. but the double line does mean the L^p norm. –  Lost1 Dec 27 '12 at 19:47
    
@Lost Yes you're right, thanks. I guess it depends on the context (maybe you should post that), but I've never seen the $|.|$ as you indicate used in the field of PDEs/analysis (not that I've seen that much..) –  soup Dec 27 '12 at 19:55
    
Yeah, I have not seen this notation either, but from the context, it seems correct. people.bath.ac.uk/masgrb/Sobolev/notes.pdf see page 18, the 3rd derivation, what we said now fits, by using the fact $a_1^p + ... + a_n^p \leq (a_1+...a_n)^p$ for $a_i$ all positive. –  Lost1 Dec 27 '12 at 20:01
add comment

If $u:\mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}$ is a function, then $\nabla u=(\partial_1 u,\ldots,\partial_n u)\in\mathbb{R}^n$ is the vector of partial derivatives. For any vector $x$, the $p$-norm $\left\|\cdot\right\|_p$ is defined as $$ \left\|x\right\|_p = \left(\sum_{i}\left|x_i\right|^p\right)^{1/p}. $$ In particular, $$ \left\|\nabla u\right\|_p = \left(\sum_{i}\left|\partial_i u\right|^p\right)^{1/p} $$ and $$ \left\|\nabla u\right\|_1= \sum_{i}\left|\partial_i u\right|. $$

share|improve this answer
    
see the answer above if you are interested in the answer. I think the lecture who wrote the notes I am reading used || || for L_p norm and | | as the norm you said. –  Lost1 Dec 27 '12 at 20:02
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.