Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm not sure about if this expression is true or false. $\emptyset \subset \emptyset $. I mean proper subset.

share|improve this question
6  
What two conditions are necessary for $A\subset B$? –  peoplepower Dec 27 '12 at 0:52
5  
Ohh I see that is false because $\emptyset = \emptyset$ –  Victor Jose Arana Rodriguez Dec 27 '12 at 0:55
1  
Now I see that it was a dumb question sorry. –  Victor Jose Arana Rodriguez Dec 27 '12 at 0:56
3  
Pay attention to the fact that many authors use the symbol $\,\subset\,$ to denote weak containment. –  DonAntonio Dec 27 '12 at 0:58
1  
@VictorJoseAranaRodriguez: You can post that as an answer to the question and accept it, if you like. –  Ben Millwood Dec 27 '12 at 1:20
show 4 more comments

7 Answers

up vote 3 down vote accepted

$A$ is a proper subset of $B$ if $A\subseteq B$ but not $A\supseteq B$. For any set $X$ we have $X\subseteq X$ and therefore also $X\supseteq X$.

Thus no set is a proper subset of itself, and neither is the empty set.

share|improve this answer
add comment

No. Let $x\in\emptyset$; since this is false, it implies $x\in\emptyset$. Hence we have $\emptyset = \emptyset$. This rules out the empty set being a proper subset of itself.

share|improve this answer
add comment

If $ A $ is a proper subset of $ B $, then $ B \setminus A \neq \varnothing $. Hence, if $ \varnothing $ were a proper subset of $ \varnothing $, then $ \varnothing \setminus \varnothing \neq \varnothing $, which is not true.

share|improve this answer
    
$B \setminus A \neq \varnothing$ does not imply that $A$ is a subset of $B$. (But, if it is, then it is indeed a proper subset.) –  François G. Dorais Dec 27 '12 at 4:41
    
Thanks for the comment. I actually meant an implication instead of a bi-implication. –  Haskell Curry Dec 27 '12 at 4:52
add comment

A set is a collection of objects of some kind. We can identify the objects in a set by listing them (if the set is finite) or by giving a rule that tells us whether an object is in the set (all positive integers less than 10, or all even integers). A set can contain one or more sets, for example the set of all the different sets that can contain zero or more of the integers 1 and 2 (try it, there are only four possible sets)

The empty set is a set that contains no objects, not even the empty set (considered as an object that could be in the set. So the empty set cannot be contained in itself. A set containing the empty set could be written by explicitly listing its contents: {∅}

share|improve this answer
add comment

If $A$ is a proper subset of $B$ then $A\neq B$. Every mathematical object is equal to itself, and so is the empty set.

Do note that $\subset$ is not always used for proper inclusion, which is why you might see $\varnothing\subset\varnothing$ written in some places.

share|improve this answer
add comment

i think empty set is not a proper subset of any non empty set because empty set has no any elment.

share|improve this answer
add comment

i think empty set is not a proper subset of itself because ∅=∅ .

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.