Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am reading Swartz's book (Measure, Integration and function spaces) and I come across an example 12, p. 73 which kind of make sense to me but not really. This deals with the mapping in the complement of Cantor and flat-Cantor set.

I was wondering if someone has better example for my question.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 6 down vote accepted

Sure. There are $\mathfrak c$ (continuum) many Borel subsets of $\mathbb R$, but there are $2^{\mathfrak c}$ many subsets of the standard Cantor set. Thus there must be a subset $A$ of the standard Cantor set which is not a Borel set. Take $g$ to be the indicator function of $A$, then $g$ is $0$ Lebesgue-a.e. and not Borel measurable.

share|improve this answer
    
How would you argue $0$ function is Borel measurable by the way, is it just trivially true? Or there is some standard way of proving it. –  Deepak Dec 25 '12 at 19:17
1  
It's easy to prove that any continuous function is Borel measurable. –  kahen Dec 25 '12 at 19:20
    
Oh I see, Thank you much. –  Deepak Dec 25 '12 at 19:23
3  
But proof that a constant is Borel measurable is easier than proof that a general continuous function is Borel measurable. –  GEdgar Dec 25 '12 at 19:38
2  
A constant function $f$ has the property that for any real number $t$, the set $\{x : f(x) > t\}$ is either the empty set or the whole space. Therefore, $f$ is measurable. –  GEdgar Dec 28 '12 at 19:48

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.