Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

what is the maxium area of a fixed perimeter closed graph?

can someone prove that the answer is a circle.

I can prove that the square have maxium area for a fixed perimeter rectangle.

share|cite|improve this question
A hexagon beats a square, and generally an $n$-gon gets better as $n$ increases, approaching a circle. – coffeemath Dec 25 '12 at 6:23
@coffeemath can we prove this rigorously? – Charles Bao Dec 25 '12 at 6:32
That a hexagon beats a square is shown by a calculation. One has to find:[1] area for square of perimeter P, [2] area for regular hexagon of perimeter P. You may as well put P=1 to compare. – coffeemath Dec 25 '12 at 6:44
If you restrict to sufficiently smooth curves, proving the circle is optimal is a standard problem in the calculus of variations. – user7530 Dec 25 '12 at 8:00

Consider a regular $n$-gon inscribed in a circle of radius $r$. Each side has length $2r \sin(\pi/n)$ giving the perimeter $$P_n=2nr\sin \frac{\pi}{n}.$$ And each of the $n$ triangles has area $r^2 \sin(\pi/n)\cos(\pi/n),$ giving the area $$A_n=n r^2 \sin \frac{\pi}{n} \cos \frac{\pi}{n}.$$ If we set $P=1$ for sake of comparisons, and solve for $r$ and plug into $A$ (and simplify) we have $$A_n=\frac{1}{4n \tan(\pi/n)}.$$ This increases as $n=3,4,5,...$ with the limit $1/(4\pi)=0.079577...,$ which is the area of a circle of perimeter 1. Note that for the square, $A_4=0.0625$, while for the hexagon, $A_6=0.0721687...$.

share|cite|improve this answer
This is pretty. But it only shows that a circle is better than any regular $n$-gon. There are still a lot of curves to be accounted for. – AndrewG Dec 25 '12 at 8:54
Andrew: I agree. I was responding to a comment by the OP in which he asked for a proof of my comment about hexagons beating squares, etc. The isoperimetric inequality is of course much deeper than comparing areas for polygons! – coffeemath Dec 25 '12 at 9:06
I thought so, I just wanted to point it out for the OP in case they thought otherwise. I very much like how intuitive this is, though! It is definitely worth remembering. – AndrewG Dec 25 '12 at 9:08

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.