Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Question on theory: If $\lim_{x\to a^+}F(x)=L$ and $\lim_{x\to a^-}F(x)$ doesn't exist, then does the $\lim_{x\to a}F(x)$ exists and is $L$?


share|cite|improve this question
What is the exact definition of the limit of a function at a point? Isn't the right limit and the left one should equal? – Babak S. Dec 24 '12 at 15:09

It depends on what you mean $\lim_{x\to a^-}F(x)$ doesn't exist.

If $F$ is not defined in $(a-\delta,a)$ for no $\delta>0$ then $x$ can't approach $a$ from the left and $\lim_{x\to a^-}F(x)$ is not defined. If that's the case then, $\lim_{x\to a}F(x)$ exists and is $L$

If $F$ is defined in $(a-\delta,a)$ for some $\delta>0$ but $\lim_{x\to a^-}F(x)$ does not exist then $\lim_{x\to a}F(x)$ does not exist

share|cite|improve this answer

No, if the limit exists, then it must exist from both sides, and those two directional limits must be equal.

share|cite|improve this answer

If the function $F(x)$ has domain say $[a,b]$ where $b>a$, so that $F(x)$ is not even defined for $x<a$, and if $\lim_{x \to a^+}F(x)=L$, then using some definitions of limit, the limit exists. Sometimes limit is defined to mean that, if $x$ approaches $a$ such that $x$ stays in the domain of $F(x)$, then the limit exists.

But many calculus texts insist on limits being defined on both sides of $a$ for the limit to be said to exist, and such texts would say only that the "one sided" limit exists.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.