Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

$A$ is a $p\times p$ real matrix and $\lambda_{i}$ are its eigenvalues. $\operatorname{tr}(A)$ is the trace of $A$.

How to geometrically interpret $\sum^{p}_{1}\lambda_{i}(A)=\operatorname{tr}(A)$?

I have learnt linear algebra for two semesters. I knew the basic concepts of trace and eigenvector.

The answer in the mathoverflow interprets geometrical meaning of trace.But,how to interpret the trace is equal to the sum of eigenvalue geometrically?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 6 down vote accepted

First, I think it helps if you can prove the statement.

The trace of a square matrix is defined to be the sum of the diagonal elements.

We can write a matrix using Jordan Normal Form, such that $$A = P^{-1} M P$$

where $A$ is a $n\times n$ real matrix with $\lambda_{i}$ as its eigenvalues.

$M$ is a (upper triangular) matrix with eigenvalues of $A$ as the diagonal elements and $P$ is an invertible matrix.

Using the rules for trace, $Tr(AB)=Tr(BA)$, we have:

$$Tr(A)= Tr( P^{-1} M P) = Tr(MPP^{-1})=Tr(M)=\sum^{p}_{1}\lambda_{i}(A)$$

Next, refer to the post on geometric-interpretation-of-trace.

Lastly, you might find the geometric-interpretation-of-characteristic-polynomial useful too.

Regards -A

share|cite|improve this answer
Wonderful answer! +1 – amWhy May 11 '13 at 0:28

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.