Let $\Omega$ be the universal set (which contains all objects of interest) and let its complement be denoted by $\Omega^c$ . The book I'm reading states that $\Omega^c = \phi$ ; does that mean $\phi \not\subset \Omega$?
- Anybody can ask a question
- Anybody can answer
- The best answers are voted up and rise to the top
Let's make a community wiki answer based on the above comments. Given a subset $A \subset \Omega$, the relative complement $A^c$ in $\Omega$ is defined as the set of elements of $\Omega$ that are not elements of $A$. So in the case that $A = \Omega$, the relative complement of $A$ in $\Omega$ is equal to $\emptyset$. That is, for every set $x$ we have $x \notin A^c$. In particular we have $\emptyset \notin A^c$. However, this is probably the "wrong" question to ask, because $\emptyset$ might not be an element of $\Omega$ at all. Notice that the empty set is a subset of every set, so in particular $\emptyset \subset \Omega$. (This is because to check whether $X \subset Y$ you take an arbitrary element of $X$ and check that it is also in $Y$. If $X$ is empty, then there is nothing to check.)
protected by Alexander Gruber♦ Jun 12 '13 at 2:13
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?