Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $\alpha$ be a monotonically increasing function on $(0,\infty)$. Let $g:(0,\infty)\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a function such that $g\in\mathscr{R}(\alpha)$ on any bounded closed connected set. (That is, $[a,b]$)

Let $a>0$ be a real.

What i have learned is;

$$\int_0^a g \, d\alpha=\lim_{t\to 0} \int_t^a g \, d\alpha$$


$$\int_a^\infty g \, d\alpha=\lim_{t\to\infty} \int_a^t g \, d\alpha$$

And for $b>0$, $\int_a^b g \, d\alpha=\lim_{t\to b}\int_a^t g \, d\alpha$ if $\alpha$ is continuous at $b$.

(If these limits exist)

Here, what is the definition of $\int_0^\infty g \, d\alpha$ ?

Which limit should i take first? And what constraint gurantees that order of taking limits is irrelevant?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 0 down vote accepted

You can write $$\int_{t_1}^{t_2} g d\alpha = \int_{t_1}^a g d\alpha + \int_a^{t_2} g d\alpha$$ and then you see that the limits act on different terms and thus the order of the limits does not matter.

share|cite|improve this answer
I don't remember what it is called, but i remember in pre-calculus class i learned some kind of integral which makes $\int_{-a}^{a} \frac{1}{x}dx=0$, which cannot be true in your definition. Is your definition is generally used for Stieltjes Integral? And what is the name of integral i just mentioned? – Katlus Dec 20 '12 at 23:08

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.