Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $(f;g)$ is a Galois connection between two posets.

Consider the special case $g\circ f = \operatorname{id}_{\operatorname{dom} f}$.

What can be said about this special case of Galois connections? Does there exist a special term for this kind of Galois connections?

share|cite|improve this question
I think its called galois insertion – Belgi Dec 17 '12 at 22:24
Search by "A primer on Galois connections". I think you can download it for free. – Makoto Kato Dec 17 '12 at 22:48
@MakotoKato: Thanks but there are no word "insertion" in "A primer on Galois connections". – porton Dec 17 '12 at 22:53
@porton I don't think the term "Galois insertion" is a standard one. Anyway, whatever they call it, I think the point is what can be said about it. Look for (co)reflections and interior(or closure) connections in that book. – Makoto Kato Dec 17 '12 at 22:57
This set of slides seems to use "Galois injection" and "Galois insertion/surjection" as different. Not sure which is which, however. See slide 21 in – Thomas Andrews Dec 18 '12 at 14:53

From the definitions on slide 21 in this PDF, the terminology seems to call this a "Galois injection."

The dual concept, where $f\circ g=1_B$, is called a "Galois surjection" or "Galois insertion." (The slides use $\alpha$ and $\gamma$, but I ran back a few slides to the definitions to make sure, and $(\alpha,\gamma)$ corresponds to $(f,g)$.

I have no idea if this is standard. Googling "Galois injection" seems to find this definition in a number of places. All of the papers I have found that use this term are in the area of theoretical computer science and logic, so you might have to be explicit outside that area.

There is a way to classify all such "Galois injections," up to isomporphism, in terms of a single operator $h$ on the right poset of the connection: $h:B\to B$.

Let $A,B$ be your two posets, with $(f,g)$ a Galois connection: $f:A\to B$ and $g:B\to A$ and $f(a)\leq b$ iff $a\leq g(b)$.

If $g(f(a))=a$, then we define $h:B\to B$ by $h(b)=f(g(b))$. Then you can show that

  • $b\leq b'$ implies $h(b)\leq h(b')$ (Since: $f,g$ are monotonic)
  • $h(b)\leq b$ (Since: $g(b)\leq g(b)$ implies $h(b)=f(g(b))\leq b$)
  • $h(h(b))=h(b)$ (Since: $h\circ h = f\circ g\circ f\circ g= f\circ 1_A\circ g = h$)

So $h$ is a closure operator of some sort on $B^{op}$.

On the other hand, if you have an operator $h$ which has these properties on $B$, define $A$ to be the image of $h$, and define $f:A\to B$ to be the natural inclusion and $g:B\to A$ to be $g=h$. Then $(f,g)$ is a Galois connection with $g\circ f = 1_A$.

Basically, such an $h$ determines $A$ up to isomorphism.

So any such Galois connection, up to isomorphism, comes from a closure operator on $B^{op}$. According Wikipedia, this is variously called a "kernel operator," an "interior operator" or a "dual closure operator."

[Aside: Note that if you had the opposite starting condition, that $f\circ g = 1_B$, then the pair would, up to isomorphism, arise from a closure operator on $A$.]

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.